Talk:Role homogeneity
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The definition given for "role homogeneity" seems really strange. It seems unlikely that the author of this definition would have gotten it wrong, but could someone please give an example or examples of it being used in practice?
The article makes the claim: "Sociologists have demonstrated that in areas of strong homogeneity, there is a general tendency to repress controversy."
This seems like an exceedingly strong claim about a complex phenomenon over which there should be considerable disagreement. Can anyone give a reference to a study or a book that makes this claim? Aren't there any practitioners in the field that doubt it? Are there any concrete examples of this? Aren't there any concrete counterexamples?
-- Beland 09:03, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
weird definition
[edit]Hey this article is really weird. I don't see what censored news has to do with role homogeneity. If someone knows of a better way to write this please do.
Guy who couldn't get a username (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:48, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Role homogeneity page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Role homogeneity" page.