User talk:ElKevbo
|
Archives
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
John Jay Article
[edit]Hey, I don't know how to leave a signature so sorry about that but saw your edit. Those were college majors (have provided a link to the correct source), I don't know if it's against WP policy to list the majors the college offers (if it does, please feel free to let me know or undo it and I apologize) but wanted to give you the heads up. Anyway, it is dedicated to Criminal Justice, hence the college's name (John Jay College of Criminal Justice). Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.41.108.33 (talk • contribs) 22:16, November 4, 2021 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for collapsing the distractions at RSN. That was frustrating to watch. VQuakr (talk) 18:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
NYU Grossman School of Medicine Milestones
[edit]Hello! I have been working on this page and the milestones section was previously quite extensive, but missing a lot of important information as well as lacking sources. You indicated with a template that the section was too long and needed cleanup. Would it be better to move this content to the History section and provide more of a prose?
Guidance appreciated :) Trench72CoatAnt (talk) 14:18, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Trench72CoatAnt: Yes, I think that section should be incorporated into the existing history section and rewritten as prose. It would likely make the section too long for the article so you'll have to decide if material should be cut or moved to a new, standalone article about the school's history. ElKevbo (talk) 19:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- That makes sense to me! There is some duplication I will remove and then where there is extended detail we can move to the History section.
- Appreciate you :) Trench72CoatAnt (talk) 14:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
[edit]- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
Heterodox Academy
[edit]Hello, You recently deleted an addition of mine in the "Heterodox Academy" article, citing "UNDUE." Would you please elaborate on your reasons for the deletion? I'm not sure why the addition of a different point of view from Beauchamp's and Quintana's violates neutrality or gives undue weight to another opinion. If Friedman's opinion, propounded in the New York Times and citing Heterodox Academy's surveys, is out of bounds, then Beauchamp and Quintana's opinions should be deleted as well. Theirs is the only third-party opinion cited in the article, and their claim that there are no data to support Heterodox Academy's concern about censorship is baseless. There are, in fact, mountains of data on self-censorship in university settings, some of which Friedman cites. Free Speech Wikipedian (talk) 17:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- I simply don't think a mention in an op ed merits inclusion in this encyclopedia article especially on a topic that has been and continues to be the subject of serious study published in peer-reviewed scholarly venues. If other similar material in the article should also be removed on those grounds then you are welcome to remove it. ElKevbo (talk) 21:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
COI Warning
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for informing me about the COI guidelines set in place to protect pages. I am employed by Brazosport College, but I can assure you that my edits were meant to be as objective as possible. If there is anything that can be done to include these edits, please let me know!
Thank you again for all you do,
Kallias Dornan KalliasDornan (talk) 20:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Many Wikipedia editors are generally okay if editors with a disclosed conflict of interest make clearly unobjectionable edits such as updating outdated information already in an article or correcting obvious typos. Substantive edits are generally frowned upon. But we welcome your suggestions and requests in the article's Talk page! ElKevbo (talk) 21:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Start a discussion with ElKevbo
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with ElKevbo. What you say here will be public for others to see.
