Talk:Fruitafossor
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vfd
[edit]On 1 Apr 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Fruitafossor for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 04:14, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
Earliest Relative
[edit]"it may have been the earliest known relative to the evolutionary line leading to Theria." - What does this mean? Isn't, say, Dimetrodon also a "relative to the evolutionary line leading to Theria" - and even earlier than fruitafossor? ErikHaugen (talk) 14:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Age
[edit]Fruitafossa is apparently known from a single specimen. If so, the 155.7-150.8 Ma is an indication of uncertainty and not a duration of existence. The lead sentence should be changed.
Dan Milton (casual reader) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.211.72 (talk) 04:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Weight
[edit]The article says that Fruitafossor weighed 6 g, but wouldn't it rather be 60 g? Because if I type in "Fruitafossor" on google, all the pages say "15 cm long" and "chipmunk sized"... Karli999 (talk) 19:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Fruitafossor page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Fruitafossor" page.