Talk:Saturday Night Live

peacock

Saturday night live is available on peacock that should be mentioned Encyclopediafanatic (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

To add to article

Basic information to add to this article: whether there will be a Season 49. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

First sentence of lead

The first sentence of the lead currently reads as follows: Saturday Night Live (often abbreviated to SNL) is an American late-night live television political satirical sketch comedy variety show created by Lorne Michaels and developed by Dick Ebersol that airs on NBC and streams on Peacock. However, I think there are too many descriptions in the sentence (do we really have to clarify every single genre?) thus I am starting this discussion.

Here are a few options, though I am open to more variations:

• Option 1: ... is an American late-night live sketch comedy show... My personal choice, as the show is characterized by being live and sketch comedy.
• Option 2: ... is an American late-night live sketch comedy variety show... An editor on WP:DISCORD suggested that variety be included.
• Option 3: ... is an American late-night live political comedy (or political satire) show... Another suggestion from an editor on Discord.

Spinixster (chat!) 14:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Option 1 is the clearest definition. While the show is sometimes political and satirical, it's often just silly. A "political satire" show sounds like the entire show is political satire, which is definitely not the case. Toughpigs (talk) 16:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Agreed. Sure, the show's sketches can be political, but that's a result of them writing to current events to keep the show topical. It's not specifically political in purpose. The inclusion of "live" is fundamentally defining (it's in the name). "Variety" is logical, because although the show does primary consist of live and pre-filmed sketches, it also includes "Weekend Update", a satirical newscast parody (which isn't really a sketch as the term is strictly defined) and musical performances by guest acts. So to that end I would say Option 2 is the best descriptor. oknazevad (talk) 17:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Option 2 is probably best, because the monologue and musical performances (and arguably Weekend Update) fall under the broader "variety" umbrella. Option 1 is also fine. Option 3 is bad, as the focus of the show is not politics. If more words need to be cut, "sketch comedy" is not particularly necessary because the rest of the first paragraph explains the format of the show. RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

The second option seems to be the most popular, but I'll be waiting for a few more days to see if there's any more votes. Spinixster (chat!) 01:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

It's been 7 days, and no more votes. I will be using option 2 as the new lead. Thanks again! Spinixster (chat!) 02:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Organisation of show history

I've just merged the extremely lengthy cast history and trivia into the main History section from the Cast and crew section. I'm not sure how it's been able to sit like how it was before for apparently years, especially with some of the info from each section being duplicate. The cast and crew section is now much more manageable and actually readable.

The History section is still very lengthy and needs more cutting down, but should really be a summary of a dedicated history article for the show. We do have dedicated history articles in five-year increments, but as has been pointed out in the past, this seems like an arbitrary distinction for the articles, and they are not used properly anyway in that broader way, basically only having information segmented by each season that should just be in the dedicated season articles.

I would argue for having a simple History of Saturday Night Live article that actually takes a more broad look at the history and could house a lot of this content that is currently making the article too long. I thought I'd try and gather some opinions here on the arbitrary five-year issue before making a dedicated merge/move/deletion/whatever request. Any opinions on all this are welcomed. StewdioMACK (talk) 11:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Also pinging Wikipedical, who was the original AfD nominator almost ten years ago. StewdioMACK (talk) 11:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I am for a History of Saturday Night Live article, but only if the information cannot be fully represented in the main article. We'd also need to decide which information to put so that it's not bloated; it should only be related to the show. A cast list for each season is probably not needed, because the articles for the individual seasons covered them already. Spinixster (trout me!) 01:27, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Adding on to this, because I forgot earlier:

• The history section / article should only summarize significant changes for the show (e.g. Michaels leaving) that is not better off in the individual season articles.
• I'm iffy with keeping the individual five-year increments history articles. Many of them are short and are basically copy-pasted from the season articles.
• The history section / article should cover the recent years (post-2000s) more. Sure, maybe not much has happened, but right now it has much more past coverage than recent ones. A balance between the two would be nice

This may be a hard request, though. I'm willing to help if needed. Spinixster (trout me!) 02:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the support and offer to help, Spinixster! I've created a draft at Draft:History of Saturday Night Live of what the new history article could look like. At the moment I just pasted the history section from this article and have added a number of images to illustrate some prominent people. I agree with you that it will need more recent coverage. I believe this proposed article should house a detailed and broad look at the show's history over time (that you are welcome to help me improve and polish), while the main article should include a more brief overview of the main points of its history. Similar to how United States summarises a more detailed History of the United States article.

I agree with deleting the cast lists that are redundant; they just need to be in the season articles, as they already are. We also have a graph of how the cast changed over time on the main article anyway, and the new History article should be a more encyclopaedic, broad rundown of how the cast has evolved in each era. My preferred course of action would be:

• keep the season articles,
• create this new unified History article, and
• delete the curent five-year articles and merge their contents into the dedicated season articles (this is completely doable as these articles have not been used as the broader perspective that they should be and are split up by season already).

As I referenced before, the five-year splits appear to have been an arbitrary decision made back in 2004 that nobody has ever revisited or questioned up to this point. Articles like History of the United States show that there's not much value in splitting up the articles like that. If you'd like to help, please feel free to help me in improving the new History draft and making it higher-quality as we try to get more opinions on all this. Thanks again. StewdioMACK (talk) 06:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

I much agree with this. I'll see what I can do to help develop the draft. Spinixster (trout me!) 07:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)