User talk:DonQuixote

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Nomination of List of Doctor Who villains for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Doctor Who villains, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Doctor Who villains until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on a user page

Hi, I added a level 3 warning template on a user page because they only edits they've ever made have been to remove the same information from a single article on several occasions now. I've only now realised/noticed that you had put a different warning template on earlier today (as yours was headed 'Welcome' I thought it had been added after their first edit; I should've looked at the timestamp, I apologise). I mention this here because I realise Wikipedia policy prevents you from removing my talk page edit, and I thought it would be best to give you the opportunity to ask me to remove my template if you think I've unnecessarily duplicated your warning. best regards, JustAnotherCompanion (talk) 20:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. DonQuixote (talk) 00:31, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Slo-Mo Dredd

Hello thank you for looking over my changes. I wanted to make a page for SLO-MO as that was necessary in order to add it to a category list of fictional drugs.

The Slo-Mo page itself redirects to Dredd and also features on a SLO-MO disambiguation page.

I agree it’s unlikely to need a full page but in order to feature on the ‘fictional drugs and medicines’ list it needed its own article. Henryryder (talk) 14:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Superman 4

Do you just don't want people to know it was filmed in Aldwych tube station or something?? Govvy (talk) 16:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite a reliable source known for fact-checking. That's literally the minimum requirement. DonQuixote (talk) 16:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want, take your pick, [1], [2], [3], and it's now your turn to restore the content because I can't break WP:3RR. Govvy (talk) 16:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you study WP:RS. Here's a hint: which of those has a fact-checking department. It's probably not the tourist companies. DonQuixote (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're clearly not here to building wikipedia then it seems, so I will blacklist you from now on. Govvy (talk) 18:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Er...ok?...seriously, WP:RS literally states Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Note that they use the same phrase that I used fact-checking. If you can't find a source that's renown for fact-checking mentioning this about a widely-known film, then it's probably not notable enough for an encyclopaedia. DonQuixote (talk) 19:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]