Jump to content

Talk:Venkateswara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove wrong information

[edit]

Sri Venkateswara Swamy is a form of Vishnu, not Avatar of Vishnu, None of the scriptures even 18 puranas didn't mentioned anything about swamy is Avatar of Bhagwan Vishnu. Avatar means taking mortal incarnation in earth for restoration of Dharma in karmabhoomi, Venkateswara can't to be considered Avatar, None of Sampradaya didn't believe this information.

Venkateswara is another pastimes of Vishnu, like Ranganatha, jagannath, vitthoba, these deities can't consider as Avatar.

Venkata is Sanskrit word, Derived from Ven, kata, means Remover of sins, Tirumala is derived from Tamil language, means divine abode.

Both venkata and tirumala are same meaning of different word. Both are in same place.

Removed wrong information that is Avatar birth and Avatar end, this is fake information. Lord Vishnu marries lakshmi avatars, like wise same vishnu in another form i.e, in venkateswara form he marries padmavati, an avatar of lakshmi, like this we cannnot considered venkateswara is avatar, he is vishnu himself, in another form. Venkateswara another name is Sri Nivasa, sri means laksmhi, which means abode and lord of laksmi, if he avatar of Vishnu, how can he is consort of Sridevi and Bhudevi. so Venkateswara swamy is form of Vishnu only, None of single scriptures mentioned this how wikipedia show, please change information and value our culture by removing fabricated missionaries. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 03:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No one responses , Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 07:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I added content in wikipedia page of Sri Venkateswara Swamy based on wikipedia link description. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 07:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanking Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 09:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sock of Vinayvinyill‎, I think. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 09:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

who is vinayviyill, Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 10:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am priest , i remove wrong information on Sri Venkateswara swamivaru, and correction the mistakes. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the page Avatar, it clearly states him as an avtar of Vishnu. It is mainly mentioned in the Manava Purana. Also, please read the page Legend of Tirumala, he had indeed taken an human avtara on earth. So stop unnecessary edits. Yupsguts (talk) 11:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read these lines: "Vishnu reincarnated as Srinivasa (or presented himself after penance in the ant-hill) as the son of the elderly woman Vakula Devi." Srinivasa is Venkateswara only, and amply sources support the statemen. Yupsguts (talk) 11:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
please dont add avatar birth and avatar end, Venkata and tirumala are same abode of different names
Ranganatha, Jagannatha, Vitthoba these are forms of vishnu, archa avatar image manifestation, if you added avatar birth and end add only to historical avatar deities not to form avatars. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 12:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Varaha purana is main text for Tirumala, it describe entire information about Tirumala abode, before vishnu taken venkateswara form, this tirumala abode is varaha kshetra, varaha swamy also reside in venkatadri, please read the literatures and descriptions of Legend of Tirumala in even wikipedia page article.
@Yupsguts Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 12:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In recent years so many christians missions harm the venkateswara swamy temple, so its main important to add affiliation to Hinduism, even so many rationalist says that he is buddha idol or skanda form, so it necessary to added Hinduism, Vaishnavism and his ethnic groups of Sri vaishnavism.
@Yupsguts Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 12:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If anydoubts regards ask me to my talk page.
Thanking You Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 12:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, please understand. Wikipedia is not a place for your personal opinions. Anything that you add to any article needs a source. Please add a source to sustain your claims or else it will be removed. Also you seem like a sock as pointed by another user. Yupsguts (talk) 12:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yupsguts, Dont ping my username to others , your wiki usersays how you are,
you join wikipedia in last three months but you edit more than 3,000 edits ,
how can it possible?,
for each 1 month you added approximately 1000 edits, this shows how you edit, please dont edit whaterver comes to your mind Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 12:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and also to you wikipedia is not personal opinion , please dont added whatever comes to mind. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 12:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
you join wikipedia in last three months but you edit more than 3,000 edits ,
how can it possible?, Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 12:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, because I have created many news page that are verified by administrator. So when you create a page. You add maximum information on it. And hence I have so many edits. I have created more than 10 pages by now. Yupsguts (talk) 12:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you also have 30 edits by now. So 30 edits a day means almost 900 a month. Basic maths. Yupsguts (talk) 12:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have added everything with a source. I think you won't understand. So better leave it Yupsguts (talk) 12:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Now clear it, Now what wikipedia mentions that is clear, dont add unsourced content, correct only mistakes Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 12:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanking You. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 12:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And Dont add Gender text, already mentioned in introduction, Venkateswara swamy is not Human , he is God. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 12:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted to the stable version pending the outcome of this discussion. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk · contribs), as you have been reverted by multiple users, you now need to gain consensus for your proposed changes, per WP:BRD. I suggest listing them individually here so other editors can see exactly what you're proposing to add/change. Thanks, Dāsānudāsa (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sir. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 13:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I restored the previous version page., please again dont add, already dicussion in talk page about sri venkateswara swamy Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 13:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dāsānudāsa sir, see that above username is blocked as sockpuppet, He edit nearly 3,000 edits just for three months, so many wrong information added for Hindu deities , please protect the page.
This user @Yupsguts is blocked as sock. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 14:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dāsānudāsa, Please revert the edits by socks, @Yupsguts, he also made edits on Lord Rama wiki page and other Hindu deities Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 14:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And also please revert edits All Hindu deities what he did , revert full last version
@Dāsānudāsa Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 14:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone edits with more wrong information on Hindu deities please to check if a sock-sweep and do lock accounts Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 14:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And Add Extended protection settings for Hindu deities. @Dāsānudāsa
Thanks. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 14:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its necessary for extended protection setting for all Hindu deities. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed changes 21 August 2024

[edit]

@Omkar prakash:, this is a place for you to seek consensus for your proposed changes to the article. If you revert to your preferred version again I will report you for edit warring (if you're not blocked for blatant sockpuppetry first). Dāsānudāsa (talk) 16:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]