Jump to content

User talk:Apokrif/archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

apokrif1 at yahoo.com

comparative polynesian phonetics chart

[edit]

hey. can you check and comment on my reply to your inquiry on the Polynesian languages article's talk page? TShilo12 05:00, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed you made some edits to the suicide article. I've created a sample layout in an effort to improve the page. I would appreciate your comments to my proposal. If you're too busy with other stuff, don't worry about it. :) Gflores Talk 21:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

[edit]

Actually, we usually favour the common name. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). "When choosing a name for a page ask yourself: What word would the average user of the Wikipedia put into the search engine?" The average person would most definitely put in MI5. The other problem with using the official name is that Security Service points to a disambig page. Yes, you can add a qualifier as you did, but it makes it rather ugly (particularly using the full qualifier that you did - would UK not have been better?). -- Necrothesp 23:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Vandalism after "last warning"

[edit]

If that happens, it's always best to report that to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. That's where administrators can take the appropriate actions to temporarily (or permanently) block or ban the user for vandalism. Thanks for the message; I reported him. Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 19:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Nevers

[edit]

Hey there. Just here to help you with your recent disambiguation pages - it's best to have them follow the traditional disambig style. I've fixed up Larry Nevers to follow this; it would be helpful if any past and future disambig pages you make look/are formatted similarly. Have fun! (|-- UlTiMuS ( U | T | C [] M | E ) 18:27, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

[edit]

The whole point of Did Six Million Really Die? is that it is not a history book; it's "revisionism" - that is, lies. Adding it to the category of "Holocaust history books" is pointless and invalid. DS 15:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Template:SCOTUSCase

[edit]

The template is widely used and has remained pretty constant for awhile. If you feel that there should be more wikification, I'd suggest taking it up on WP:SCOTUS and seeing what other people think. I don't particularly care either way whether or not more linking is included, however, if it's done, the linking should be systematic and consistent. Cheers. --MZMcBride 22:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vanuatu Scouting

[edit]

Can you help render "Be Prepared", the Scout Motto, into Bislama? Thanks! Chris 06:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Usenet control message, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Usenet control message has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Usenet control message, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Max Mosley

[edit]

Hi. See response at my talk page. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 07:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Tamil Script

[edit]

Hi Apokrif. I've fixed the punctuation error you had pointed out. Thanks. -- Sundar \talk \contribs 13:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blackknight12 (talk) 11:58, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Talk Page ... Talk:Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants#Information about unreported and unpublished cases

According to PATRICK S. RYAN, Revisiting the United States Application of Punitive Damages: Separating Myth from Reality: "The case is not reported or published, which means that under United States law it cannot be considered as valid precedent for any legal purpose. Westlaw has a simple one-page "unpublished" version available as part of its database service. Lexis-Nexis has no record of the case. Regarding the appeal, there is nothing, either in published, unpublished, or any other unofficial or official form." Is it possible, to get reliable data on a case, to request a copy (perhaps by e-mail) of the judgment form the court, instead of relying on commercial services? How do Lexis-Nexis or Westlaw get their data? Apokrif 22:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that this was simply a case that was tried at the trial court level. It was never appealed. Thus, it makes perfect sense that Westlaw and Lexis-Nexis do not have this case in their databases of appeals. (Actually, I think that both sides did indeed file an appeal, but the parties ultimately settled the case before actually arguing said appeal.) Since this was only a trial level court case, there would be no published decision to report. One might, perhaps, get trial court transcripts (at a very hefty cost) ... but there would be no "published" or "reported" decision per se at the trial court level. As far as your question about Westlaw and Lexis-Nexis: they certainly focus on publishing reported / published opinions that are generated at the appeals level. The decisions in these appeals are available to the general public ... and, thus, are easily available for Westlaw and Lexis-Nexis to access. As far as trial level court cases ... only for a pretty significant or important trial case (such as this one) would Westlaw and Lexis-Nexis decide to include the case in their databases. Precisely for the reason you mention. Such trial level cases have no precedential value whatsoever. Thus, they essentially have no real "legal" value at all (to attorneys, or courts, or parties to litigation). Westlaw and Lexis-Nexis will only include a small number of these types of cases (those conducted only at the trial level, and not taken to the appeal level) simply for the general public interest that they generate ... and, perhaps, for academic purposes also. I hope this answers your questions. Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro, 6 September 2009)

The article Sairam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The 2 terms are not even close to each other so no need for disambiguation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 15:41, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Sairam, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sairam. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ridernyc (talk) 16:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Arbre

[edit]

Hello Apokrif, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Arbre, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Xtzou. This has been done because the page is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Xtzou. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Xtzou (talk · contribs) 15:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recruiting french speaking members

[edit]

Hello, I noticed your contribution to the MK article and am grateful for it but I noticed on your page that it says you are fluent in French. I'm asking that you could please translate or at least find something of interest in this video: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x52xat_making-of-mortal-kombat_shortfilms It's the making of the first MK film (however the language is in french) and I would like to use this to add more to the film's development section the article. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 23:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Arbre

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Arbre, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbre. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Trovatore (talk) 09:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Madryga

[edit]

I saw you tagged this article as a possible copyright violation of Applied Cryptography. I see that the three design principles not fulfilled by DES are copied verbatim (I'm not sure if those are copied verbatim from W.E. Madryga to begin with or not), but I'm not seeing any other copy/paste or even close paraphrase from the book. Can you elaborate on what part(s) looked like the copyright violation to you? VernoWhitney (talk) 17:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I did sit down with Applied Cryptography second edition when I looked over it. I'll look through the first edition later today but if that doesn't turn up anything I'm going to tentatively mark it as clean. If something else comes to mind, please let me know. Help with spotting copyright issues is always appreciated! VernoWhitney (talk) 17:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Phosphate mining in Nauru

[edit]

I see that you created Category:Phosphate mining in Nauru. DO you think it may be to small a topic for a category. Admittedly, the phosphate mining had a major effect on Nauru but I don't know if it will get a lot of articles. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CFD for Category:United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

[edit]

Please note that a category you created, Category:United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. TJRC (talk) 21:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

State court

[edit]

Hi, now that State court is a disambig, please remember to help WP:FIXDABLINKS. This tool makes the job a lot easier. Thanks, --JaGatalk 17:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some of them, but there are still a lot of links to fix. Your help would still be appreciated, since your edits created the need for cleanup. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 20:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Einheitspsychosen

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Einheitspsychosen , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. FiachraByrne (talk) 20:03, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sanitätswesen move

[edit]

I noticed that you moved this article to Sanitätswesen (German concentration and extermination camps). Modern-day Germany has no such camps. I find the title a bit unwieldly anyway, but shouldn't that read "Nazi" instead of "German"? I mean, not all Germans are Nazis, but writing something like "German concentration camp" makes it sound like it could be an ongoing, rather than a historical thing. Thanks. Marrante (talk) 17:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A shorter title might be to make the parens read "(Nazi Germany)" instead of the much longer "concentration and extermination camps". Doesn't "Nazi Germany" sort of cover it? Marrante (talk) 17:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see the German WP uses "Sanitätswesen (KZ)" on their disambiguation page, with "(in nationalsozialistischen Konzentrationslagern)" as an explanation. We don't have the same ease of use with "KZ" but I'll work it out. Thanks for telling me your intent with the move. Marrante (talk) 18:42, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bletchley Park?

[edit]

Hi. You seem rather insistent on including Bletchley Park in Category:Cryptographic attacks, which is inappropriate. Bletchley Park is as much a crypto attack as is the NSA or CIA. Examples of the articles included in the category:

  • Adaptive chosen-ciphertext attack
  • Adversary (cryptography)
  • Attack model
  • Banburismus
  • Birthday attack
  • Bit-flipping attack
  • Black bag operation
  • Black-bag cryptanalysis
  • Boomerang attack
  • Brute-force attack
  • Chosen-ciphertext attack
  • Chosen-plaintext attack
  • Ciphertext-only attack
  • Clock drift

Inclusion of Bletchley Park in this category makes no sense. The way to deal with these things is to discuss them, not just to revert. I would love to talk about it on the article Talk page with you. If, however, you continue to mis-categorize pages, we'll be talking about this on an Administrator's Noticeboard, instead, and I'd really rather not do that. — UncleBubba T @ C ) 22:59, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Congressional Research Service reports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copyright Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Tsirang District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chirang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aimal Qazi

[edit]

Nomination of Aimal Qazi for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aimal Qazi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimal Qazi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LuciferWildCat (talk) 20:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Bruno Gollnisch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages St Peter's Square and Vatican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Defense Language Aptitude Battery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited G.I. Jane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hell week (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sex discrimination

[edit]

Category:Sex discrimination, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:33, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Merit badge (Boy Scouts of America), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eagle scout (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Directorate-General for External Security, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anthropophilia in animals‎ for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthropophilia in animals‎ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthropophilia in animals‎ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

TRW move to TRW Inc.

[edit]

Hi Apokrif. Could you please clarify why you made this move? It caused more than 300 articles to point to a disambiguation page. I have looked at most of those articles in the past and I can't remember any that should point to anything other than the moved article. Best Regards, Overjive (talk) 04:29, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you guys are addressing these links quickly. Let me know if I can help! Overjive (talk) 11:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bagdasaryan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pichpich (talk) 18:26, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative category titles

[edit]

Hello,

I recently came across Category:Wikipedia:Public domain, which you created, and wanted to let you know that the titles of administrative categories, although they are prefixed with the word "Wikipedia", do not need a second colon. Hence, I have nominated that category for speedy renaming to Category:Wikipedia public domain. For details, see Wikipedia:Category names#Special conventions.

Cheers! -- Black Falcon (talk) 17:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page move request

[edit]

If you want to request a page to be moved (renamed), use WP:RM. I've closed your edit request at Talk:Geneva Conventions, since the page is not edit protected and your request doesn't involve any editing. RudolfRed (talk) 01:13, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Xenu's Link Sleuth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broken link (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:15, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sable Island, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sandy Island and Sand Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brebeuf Jesuit Preparatory School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preparatory school (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia:Hoaxes

[edit]

Category:Wikipedia:Hoaxes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:48, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bin Laden Issue Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia:Chinese language

[edit]

Category:Wikipedia:Chinese language, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian help needed

[edit]

Hello Apokrif, I'm contacting you because we need some Albanian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sq.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Albanian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I have only basic skills in Albanian. Apokrif (talk) 09:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited High Court, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Court of Parliament (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sex discrimination

[edit]

Category:Sex discrimination, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fields Medal page

[edit]

Hello there,I'm that user who's been the victim of editing the Fields Medal page(i.e.I got blocked with charge of Vandalism.).I've got three question:1)When the current protected status of that page ends,Does the page current contents remain in place or they are replaced with the old version? 2)I've prepared a new and somehow comprehensive table about Fields medalists.I posted this table on the discussion section of the Fields Medal page,and I request for comments about this(If You come there and see my that table I will be really glad,and don't forget to put your comment about it down there!;-)),but so far,just one person did so.Is it normal? 3)Should I submit a request for edit to replace the new table with current one?Or should I wait for reaching a consensus?Thank You. Rezameyqani (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Rezameyqani (talk) 08:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You created quite a mess but never responded. The article should have stayed at Motion (legal) because the vast majority of jurisdictions use terms like application or request instead. --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Texas State Hospital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism and edit warring.

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Jeppiz (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please be more careful?

[edit]

In November of 2013 you redirected Penny Lane (Guantanamo) to Guantanamo Bay detention camp#Facilities. In my opinion, this redirection was highly problematic, because the article on the Guantanamo Bay detention camp should be devoted solely to the secretive MILITARY camp. Like Camp Strawberry Fields, Camp Penny Lane was an even more secretive CIA camp.

In my opinion, this redirection was problematic because the "facilities" section does not say anything about Camp Penny Lane.

May I suggest that if you ever come across a red-link and consider redirecting it to some larger topic, you pause, and give this more thought than you did here? How much effort should a quality control volunteer perform before they add a {{prod}} tag? Policy-compliant contributors comply with WP:BEFORE, and do a web search on a topic, before they suggest deletion, to make sure they are not suggesting deleting our coverage of a strongly notable topic simply because the current article was weak.

Your change of the red-link to a blue-link is confusing to other contributors. In my opinion, Camp Penny Lane is an important enough topic to merit a standalone article. When the wikilink for that topic is blue, it looks like that article has already been written. A red-link, on the other hand, is a strong reminder that the article hasn't been written yet.

I suggest that it would have been better for the wikipedia, if you weren't going to write the artilce yourself, for you to have left it as a red-link.

I am also very concerned by a trend I find ill-advised of redirecting to subsections within larger articles. In my opinion, if a topic is worthy of a wikilink, it is almost certainly worthy of an article on its own. In my opinion, the reasons why wikilinking to subsections within larger articles is a mistake, include:

  1. Proper articles have a lede sentence, lede paragraph -- something not appropriate for a section within an article;
  2. Only full articles can be placed on our watchlists;
  3. The "what links here" button only works on full articles.
    Contrast this with the situation for those poor souls who write web pages on the plain old world-wide-web. They have no idea how many other web-pages link to their page. So they can only guess at how many external web-links they will break, if they change the name of the url of a page.
  4. Redirection is not full supported when the target of the wikilink is a subsection heading within a larger article. We have hard-working robots which quietly work in the background to make sure redirects always work. When someone changes the name of an article, the hard-working robots that look for double redirects find all the redirects that point to the old name, and change them to point to the new name.

    Contributors feel they are free to change section headings, correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, or change them to bring them up to date with what the section is about, when that has been changed. And if one contributor changes a section heading that someone else has made part of a hybrid wikilink to a section heading within another article, then that wikilink breaks. When contributors follow the practice you followed here they make fragile wikilinks that silently break, are hard to fix, and hard to detect that they have failed.

I am going to repeat the opinion that if a topic is important enough that it merits a wikilink it is almost certainly important enough to merit its own standalone article. Geo Swan (talk) 07:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 16:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scientology is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBSCI

[edit]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Scientology, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


$cientology

[edit]

Apokrif, I reverted you (I won't do so again, however ). You're whitewashing the Scientology article. Bottom line, it's not a new religious movement, it's a cult, made up by L. Wrong Hubbard on a bet he had with another Science Fiction writer. Read the Penthouse interview with his son - he states this outright, and remember, his son has every reason in the world to keep his mouth shut, after all, he stood to gain a lot of money , and possible power and prestige within the cult of Scientology, therefore he'd have no reason to have given the candid interview that he gave. You don't say on this page or your French page if you're a scientologist yourself, and I don't think I can ask you or speculate on it, so I won't do so, but at the very least you seem to have a conflict of Interest based on your editing, you may want to edit elsewhere for the time being. KoshVorlon 17:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"it's not a new religious movement, it's a cult" We are not interested in you points of view.
"you seem to have a conflict of Interest based on your editing" No. Apokrif (talk) 17:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, it's not my point of view, it's actually the point of view of the late L.Ron Hubbard JR, he stated as much in his Penthouse interview, and you answered my second question by showing my your contribs. Remember, it's not how much you contribute, but how you edit certain article that shows COI or POV, I'll reiterate, I can't and won't accuse you of having one directly, but your whitewash of $cientology sure looks like it. KoshVorlon 19:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like you don't distinguish between expressing a wikipedian's point of view in the article space (which is forbidden by policy) and stating the point of view of notable people (here, various French public authorities who wrote about cults), which is not. Note that I don't necessarily agree whith all the people I cite in WP articles (I often don't). Regarding your edits on my talk page, I suggest you read Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a forum. Apokrif (talk) 14:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Embedded link and template in Kenji Goto article

[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your interest in the Kenji Goto article. I had to revert your recent edit to the article for a couple of reasons. Firstly, it added an embedded link, which are now discouraged (see Wikipedia:Embedded citations). Secondly, you replaced an occurrence of the {{As of}} template, which is used to mark dated statements. It is there for a purpose, so please be careful about removing templates or formatting you are not familiar with. Drop us a line here or on my Talk page if there is still anything you are unclear about. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Court uniform and dress listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Court uniform and dress. Since you had some involvement with the Court uniform and dress redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

[edit]

Bonjour et voilà (after almost a year). The normal pronunciation in Germany is more like [ˈkʁɪ⁠stɔ⁠f ˈblɔ⁠⁠xɐ], but in Swiss German it's like in the article. --Komischn (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't create such overly specific categories (which is additionally misnamed here) that subdivide the case law of individual courts by topic. If you think it's a viable topic for subdividing case law, create it instead at the country level, as you did with Category:United Kingdom pornography case law (and note that Category:United States pornography case law does not yet even exist, let alone the even more specific Category:United States child pornography case law). postdlf (talk) 00:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tay (bot) has been nominated for Did You Know

[edit]

TRW/version 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TRW/version 2. Since you had some involvement with the TRW/version 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Notecardforfree (talk) 22:40, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tay (bot)

[edit]

On 8 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tay (bot), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that within a day of the release of the Microsoft chatterbot Tay on Twitter, it was taken offline because it started making inflammatory tweets? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tay (bot). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:United States Supreme Court patent case law, which you created, has been nominated for merging to Category:United States patent case law. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional United States federal judges has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Fictional United States federal judges, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

[edit]

Hey, what are these categories you're setting up? This doesn't appear to be how we generally do categories. Perhaps "Gender identity policies and essays" is a better category title?--v/r - TP 21:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of course subcategories (e.g. for policies or essays) can be created, but if we only had a category named "policies and essays", it could not be used for other topics, like templates for user pages. Apokrif (talk) 11:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Heck, doesn't really matter what it's called, but the double colon (:) is tripping me. We don't usually create categories like "Category:Wikipedia:Something". Unless you've seen it elsewhere, but I haven't. I've seen "Category:Wikipedia something", though.--v/r - TP 17:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what the consensus is on en.wikipedia.org (I don't really really mind if this category or other Wikipedia: categories I've created are renamed), however the use of this prefix is consistent whith the naming of articles: the Wikipedia: prefix clearly indicates that these are meta-pages, not encyclopedia articles about Wikipedia. Apokrif (talk) 18:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have no opinion on whether a separate category is needed, but the second colon should not be there—except for proper nouns, titles shuld contain only one colon to identify the namespace (Category: in this case). See Wikipedia:Category names#Special conventions: "Categories used for Wikipedia administration are prefixed with the word 'Wikipedia' (no colon) if this is needed to prevent confusion with content categories." Therefore, I have renamed this category to Category:Wikipedia gender. -- Black Falcon (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

[edit]

Category:Wikipedia:Christianism has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Wikipedia:Christianism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 19:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

[edit]

Move reverted.

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your bold move of Warrant Officer Basic Course has been reverted because an editor has found it to be controversial. Per Wikipedia:Requested moves, a move request must be placed on the article's talk page, and the request be open for discussion for seven days, "if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested". Such consensus is particularly required before moving a title with incoming links in order to create a disambiguation page at that title. If you believe that this move is appropriate, please initiate such a discussion to form the appropriate consensus. Again, please note that moving a page with a longstanding title and/or a large number of incoming links is more likely to be considered controversial, and may be contested. bd2412 T 14:43, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Mentalism (discrimination), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. These interwiki links are no longer used, instead, we now use Wikidata since one only has to do that once. Laber□T 05:22, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

[edit]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Apokrif. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

[edit]

Category:Cut (cards) has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Cut (cards), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on California Fish and Game Commissio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

[edit]

Category:Fictional characters of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 03:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

[edit]

The Real Housewives of ISIS listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Real Housewives of ISIS. Since you had some involvement with the The Real Housewives of ISIS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:00, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ATTENTION

[edit]

Please look in to the matter and read my edit summary . [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.50.79.74 (talk) 17:26, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just noticed that the redirect page Carrion Comfort#The Island Club 2 which you recently created from the page Island Club two days ago was already an article request made in WikiProject Lagos several months ago. Please, could you change the title of the redirect by moving it to The Island Club or elsewhere to differentiate it from the one for the city of Lagos? The one for Lagos is a notable existing club compared to the fictional one in the novel. If you don't concurr with me, then I suggest we make the page a disambiguation link as a compromise. Thanks Eruditescholar (talk) 21:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You just need to create a disambiguation page yourself or use Template:For after the page about Lagos has been created. Apokrif (talk) 13:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

健肺村 listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 健肺村. Since you had some involvement with the 健肺村 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. feminist 10:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

[edit]

Category:Extraterrestrials-humankind relations has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Extraterrestrials-humankind relations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020 (talk) 19:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

[edit]

A page you started (Danguillaume) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Danguillaume, Apokrif!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see MOS:DAB for how to make a complete, properly formatted disambiguation page.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 05:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Videos of dancing children has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Videos of dancing children, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:18, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Claude Silberzahn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fyddlestix (talk) 04:31, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (IIAP) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating IIAP, Apokrif!

Wikipedia editor I.am.a.qwerty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

added more entries for IIAP disambiguation page

To reply, leave a comment on I.am.a.qwerty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 00:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American reality television series about game wardens, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Schizophrenia in TV series has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Schizophrenia in TV series, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 02:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Prison medicine has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Prison medicine, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Treatment of sleep disorders has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Treatment of sleep disorders, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

[edit]

Category:Prison healthcare has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Prison healthcare, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Apokrif. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

[edit]

A page you started (Jon Erickson) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Jon Erickson, Apokrif!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I added some introductory context and descriptions to better aid readers. Please see MOS:DAB for more style conventions.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 21:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

[edit]

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

[edit]

Category:French anti-cult organizations and individuals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:38, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cults in France has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Cults in France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

[edit]

Category:People sentenced to death by gender or sex, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 14:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

[edit]

A page you started (Look Me in the Eye (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Look Me in the Eye (disambiguation), Apokrif!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see MOS:DAB and WP:DDD. There should generally be only one blue link per bullet point.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 23:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional prison physicians has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Fictional prison physicians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 02:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

[edit]

Category:Male computer scientists has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Male computer scientists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Category:Education in economics has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Education in economics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:45, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Containment (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Limited series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Limited series is the only relevant page I found (it contains the relevant definition: "A television show with a predetermined number of episodes telling a complete story arc, usually longer than a miniseries"). Apokrif (talk) 07:45, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

[edit]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

NCIS (season 10) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to CGIS
NCIS (season 11) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to CGIS
NCIS (season 12) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to CGIS

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Jeong DR

[edit]

Hello, I have brought the unfruitful Sarah Jeong discussion to dispute resolution and am notifying you because you have commented on the Talk page since August 3. You can find a link here: Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Sarah_Jeong. All the best, Ikjbagl (talk) 12:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

[edit]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tumbler (Project Xanadu), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Apokrif. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Apokrif. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NO LIMIT NIGGA listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect @NO LIMIT NIGGA. Since you had some involvement with the @NO LIMIT NIGGA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:43, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Controversies about women in science and technology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. wumbolo ^^^ 14:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus was to delete the category; therefore, please do not recreate it without first going through deletion review. I have speedily deleted the category as a recreation of a previously deleted page, and also nominated the subcategory, Category:People involved in controversies about women in science and technology, at CFD. -- Black Falcon (talk) 22:49, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

[edit]

January 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Arkham Asylum does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. "novel" provides no context as to why you're adding it to an article about the Batman franchise while noting it's not a part of said franchise, especially when it's evidently not significant enough for its own article. Please do not re-add without discussion at the article's Talk page. DonIago (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

[edit]

Komalah

[edit]

Hello. Please could you help us to fix the mis-directed links arising from retargeting Komalah? Most of the links are clearly about a political party, but it's not obvious to the layman whether they're intended for the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan or Komalah (CPI). Thanks, Certes (talk) 15:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Certes: IMHO as "komalah" is very similar to "komala", it's safer to view it as a spelling variant of komala and to keep komalah redirected to Komala rather than Komalah (CPI), in case editors mix up both spellings and erroneously write komalah somewhere when they actually mean komala. Apokrif (talk) 22:51, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that sounds very sensible. The problem was that several articles linked to the disambiguation page via Komalah and it wasn't clear whether to change them to Komalah (CPI) or some other meaning, but someone has sorted them out in the last couple of days. Certes (talk) 23:48, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiTalk

[edit]

It's done. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional California Institute of Technology people ‎, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 04:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

[edit]

Category:User account security has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:User account security, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Izno (talk) 23:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

[edit]

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

[edit]

Category:Wikimedia Foundation litigation has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Wikimedia Foundation litigation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –MJLTalk 05:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

[edit]