Jump to content

Talk:Zirconium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleZirconium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 12, 2008Good article nomineeListed
April 5, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
March 30, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
May 16, 2022Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

Untitled

[edit]

Article changed over to new Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements format by maveric149. Elementbox converted 11:29, 6 July 2005 by Femto (previous revision was that of 05:32, 4 July 2005).

Information Sources

[edit]

Some of the text in this entry was rewritten from Los Alamos National Laboratory - Zirconium. Additional text was taken directly from USGS Zirconium Statistics and Information, from the Elements database 20001107 (via dict.org), Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) (via dict.org) and WordNet (r) 1.7 (via dict.org). Data for the table were obtained from the sources listed on the subject page and Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements but were reformatted and converted into SI units.


"Zircronium" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zircronium. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Physical properties and Characteristics do not match mp, bp

[edit]

The Melting point and Boiling point listed under Physical properties (in the right-hand sidebar) and under Characteristics in the main body do not match. I am unsure where to find definitive information to correct this error. 72.135.238.191 (talk) 07:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

After reviewing this article, I do not believe this article meets the GA criteria anymore. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • I agree with the orange banner at the top that this article's lede is too short.
  • There are multiple uncited paragraphs and sentences

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? If not, should it go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 22:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

There are many uncited statements, and an orange banner indicating that the lede is too short, which I agree with. Z1720 (talk) 00:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just fix it instead? Johnjbarton (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the intro and added refs for each citation needed. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Johnjbarton: I do not have the expertise, nor the desire, to find sources, evaluate their usefulness, add prose, and ensure that the article has returned to fulfilling the GA criteria. If others are interested, they are welcome to improve the article and ping me when it is ready for a re-review. Z1720 (talk) 16:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Z1720 Thanks for the reply, but I'm puzzled. On the one hand you're uninterested and lack expertise, but on the other you are evaluating and judging. Seems like an odd combination. Are you on some kind of assignment?
    In any case I'll try to fix citations needed if they arise in the future. Johnjbarton (talk) 00:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden content

[edit]

How can the oxidation state data be edited? It's not in the article and not in Template:infobox zirconium Johnjbarton (talk) 01:46, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The oxidation states are in here. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 07:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Johnjbarton (talk) 15:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]