Talk:Woolly monkey
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Type speciem
[edit]In do not understand how there can be a type speciem for a genus. Actually it makes only sense for a species or a subspecies. --Altaileopard 23:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- You are confusing a type specimen with a type species. If the genus were to be split into two genera, which ever of the two genera contained the current type species would retain the name, and the other would be given a new name, as well as a new type species. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ups, sorry, I meant type specimen.--Altaileopard 19:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC).
Anatomy
[edit]The Anatomy topic needs citations
Nithin.danday (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Woolly monkey page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Woolly monkey" page.