Jump to content

Talk:Moorgate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleMoorgate is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 9, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 2, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
April 13, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
May 5, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Pictures removed

[edit]

This article had a lot of pictures, some of which were a bit "uninteresting", and having so many caused layout madness in my browser when the pictures were longer than the article:

Moorgate (street), looking towards 20 Moorgate (left) and 12 Moorgate (right).

Bank of England building, located at the intersection of Moorgate with Prince's Street and Lothbury.

The Guildhall and the Moorhouse are nice to look at, but I'm not quite sure these are worthy of inclusion. Metaeducation 20:16, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tube Crash and Moorgate Station details

[edit]

Having a separate section for Moorgate station and the tube crash doesn't seem to make a lot of sense when they have their own articles (Moorgate station, Moorgate tube crash). Perhaps the article on the crash should be integrated into the article for the station, but either way, duplicating the story here doesn't really seem to serve much purpose. I think a link works and will encourage people to improve those articles and speak more broadly about the Moorgate area itself here. Metaeducation 20:16, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

yeah-User:Carsoncocars

Moorgate Street and neighbourhood

[edit]

I've removed a reference to Moorgate being a "dual carriageway street". I walk along Moorgate every day, and it's not a dual carriageway (unlike nearby London Wall). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.18.1.9 (talk) 02:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Someone was asking about a free map: try this page? http://informationfreeway.org/?lat=6713515.1532&lon=-9833.50212&zoom=17&layers=B000000 Ojw 12:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roman origin?

[edit]

The main London article claims the gate is of medieval origin, and that it's the only London gate that didn't originate in the roman era. Neither article has a citation there. Anyone know which is true? Maltice (talk) 16:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Moorgate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Moorgate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moorgate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]