Talk:Time Warp (song)

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Time Warp (song) was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 13, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Time Warp (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 18:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Love this song! Will review soon --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail[edit]

I hate to do this since I have a strongly positive opinion of the song, as stated above, but I have to quick fail the article. Not only has the nominator made barely any edits to it before trying to promote this article, which goes against the instructions, but it meets the immediate failure criteria due to many citation needed tags being included. On top of this, the lead is poorly written and the article is far from being broad in its coverage. --Kyle Peake (talk) 19:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake: Thanks for looking at this. One question, can you look at the last edit on the external links and give an opinion? --evrik ^(talk) 20:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Evrik: I have now, the links are indeed copyright violations since they lead to copyrighted content that is upload from unofficial channels. --Kyle Peake (talk) 20:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]