Jump to content

Talk:Hollaback Girl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleHollaback Girl is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleHollaback Girl has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHollaback Girl is part of the Love. Angel. Music. Baby. series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 13, 2007.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 13, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
November 28, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 1, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 2, 2005Good article nomineeListed
January 2, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 4, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
January 29, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 22, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 22, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 31, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
May 9, 2007Featured topic candidatePromoted
June 16, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
September 20, 2011Featured topic candidateNot promoted
March 13, 2016Featured article reviewDemoted
September 7, 2016Good article nomineeNot listed
June 5, 2020Peer reviewReviewed
June 21, 2020Good article nomineeListed
July 31, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 3, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Gwen Stefani's song "Hollaback Girl" was the first single ever to sell more digital downloads than CDs?
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Remixes

[edit]

There's one more remix you might have to add to the list. I remembered there being a 12" vinyl of a Fingazz remix featuring singer/rapper Diamonique. Given the age of the song, the vinyl of it may have already disappeared; however, the remix does appear on Fingazz's discography. ElMeroEse (talk) 01:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FAR might be needed

[edit]

From a glance, I'm not sure this is up to FA-standards. The lead doesn't include genres, critics' opinions, or anything on the music video. The "track listings" section is unreferenced, and so is most of "In pop culture". I'm also not sure if the audio samples are really beneficial. I'll check back in a week or so to see if any improvements have been made. Otherwise, I will list this at FAR. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Hollaback Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:50, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hollaback Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hollaback Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review the fourth

[edit]

I plan on taking this article back to WP:PR, but I already have another article waiting to be responded to – once that's out, I'll put mine in. Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 16:41, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk07:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Thatoneweirdwikier (talk). Self-nominated at 15:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Substantial article, meeting of GA criteria implicates DYK pass. Article was promoted to Good status within 7 days of nomination. Editor is QPQ exempt. Hook is interesting, cited, and short enough for DYK. I will note that DYK does get an abundance of "[article] was the first [blank]" hooks submitted so editors occasionally recommend that nominators submit one or two alternate hooks, but I personally think this hook is interesting enough to stand on its own. Morgan695 (talk) 04:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]