Talk:Magick Image File Format
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]from VfD:
Geekcruft. Less notable than XBin, garners a weak 1100 hits in google. [1] —RaD Man (talk) 08:43, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. As far as I know, the format is almost never used. --Carnildo 08:46, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, I don't see it (nn). Wyss 18:48, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep potentially useful info. this article is doing no harm, why mess with it? if it is truly bothersome, just merge with ImageMagick and redirect. Wolfman 01:24, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- keep' Yuckfoo 04:50, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge with ImageMagick, don't redirect. --fvw* 08:04, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
- ImageMagick is very popular and widely used; I can see how someone might end up searching or linking to this article. Either keep or redirect to ImageMagick. —Psychonaut 17:24, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. This information is much more relevant than the number of hits on Google. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 17:28, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect with ImageMagick. PoccilPeter O. (Talk, automation script)[[]] 07:29, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - there is no valid reason to put this forward for deletion. "Geekcruft" is not listed in the deletion policy - David Gerard 23:06, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - It's informitive and useful. I see no reason to kill it --Fyrefiend 06:36, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. "*cruft" is a lousy basis to present for deletion, this looks like it fits under the Wikipedia umbrella to me. Bryan 20:54, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
Start a discussion about improving the Magick Image File Format page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Magick Image File Format" page.