Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Floriano Peixoto
Reason: 3 accounts of the IP sock master warned multiple times. Page has been protected, and 2 of his accounts have been blocked. They still insist on coming back with a new IP address. IP tries to add content without sources, deletes material without explanation, and ignores multiple user warnings. Auzandil (talk) 05:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I looked at the most recent IP edits (the only IP edits since protection expired) and they seem defensible. I am reluctant to semi-protect the article given that the IP had removed "
and for his remarkable deeds he is widely considered a national hero to the brazilians
" which you restored in diff. Are you sure that is how an encyclopedic article should be written? Is there a reference? Also, there is nothing relevant on article talk. Can you identify some recent vandalism? Johnuniq (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC) - I forgot to ping Auzandil. Johnuniq (talk) 06:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I understand what you mean. I believe that's more than just an edit dispute. That sentence is problematic, for sure, and I'm okay with deleting it. The issue is, the user deleted more than just that and said nothing. He deleted half of the page before protection. In his previous edits, they reverted changes, insisted on his version, and refused to communicate with other users. Is this how an article should be edited? He vandalized pages, and did block evasion. Should we allow sockedits and let other IP users do the same? There is no end to this.
- Please see what he did. I can't think of any "good faith" at this point. @Johnuniq
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=On_the_Cult_of_Personality_and_Its_Consequences&action=history
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Stalin%27s_rise_to_power&action=history Auzandil (talk) 06:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have to go elsewhere for a while and am hoping others will have a look. Johnuniq (talk) 07:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2804:d4b:9a3b:3e00::/64 (talk · contribs). The real problem is that they make contested edits to multiple articles and refuse to discuss on talk pages in spite of warnings. See also 45.238.113.186 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). It's a short-term block to get their attention. Favonian (talk) 15:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Dangerous World Tour
Reason: Addition of unsourced content that has been reverted repeatedly. HorrorLover555 (talk) 12:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:3813:c301::/64 (talk · contribs). One-week partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
The One That Got Away (Philippine TV series)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 12:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: TVJ loser (talk · contribs) blocked by Smalljim. No IP edits, vandalism or otherwise, within recent memory. Favonian (talk) 16:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Baig
Reason: Repeatedly being changed from a redirect to a duplicate article, contrary to the merge consensus at Talk:Bey#Merge_proposal - Arjayay (talk) 12:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2001:1a10:1590:4901::/64 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 15:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Brazil national football team records and statistics
Reason: Edit warring since end of June, there has been no attempt to start a discussion. Jerium (talk) 13:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I don't claim to understand (or care about) the details of the dispute, but Talk:Brazil national football team records and statistics#Head-to-head session looks like the beginning of a discussion. Favonian (talk) 16:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Kevin Quiambao
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 13:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 16:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Rick Beato
Reason: A months-long campaign of BLP vandalism, revitalized immediately at the recent lift of the block. We're going to need a bigger boat block. signed, Willondon (talk) 15:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- There's been a culling of the IP herd. Waiting so see if it has the desired effect. Favonian (talk) 16:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
CBS News Mornings
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs have been repeatedly removing the main image of the page. Broc (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2601:183:4b82:e70::/64 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 16:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Battle of Agios Dometios
Reason: High level of vandalism and edit warring, which involves heavy usage of POV partisan and non-3rd party sources. Ao192 (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Brenda Biya
Reason: Biya has recently received international media coverage (see below) over her coming out. She already has an article on the French Wikipedia, which I have translated at Draft:Brenda Biya. Coverage:
- https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj7dnm3elkdo
- https://www.vanguardngr.com/2024/07/cameroon-presidents-daughter-brenda-biya-reveals-lesbian-status/
- https://www.them.us/story/anastasia-brenda-biya-cameroon-instagram-coming-out-layyons-valenca
- https://www.thepinknews.com/2024/07/03/brenda-biya-lesbian-lgbtq-layyons-valenca/
- https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/why-has-cameroon-president-daughter-instagram-kiss-post-sparked-an-lgbtq-debate-13789208.html
- https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2024/07/04/dochter-van-president-kameroen-brengt-vader-in-verlegenheid-met/
- https://information.tv5monde.com/afrique/brenda-biya-fille-du-president-du-cameroun-affirme-son-homosexualite-2728277 ―Howard • 🌽33 17:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- How is this not WP:BLP1E? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I imagine that article would become a lightening rod for BLP-violating content. I agree even the draft is WP:BLP1E; any coverage is due to her being the daughter of Paul Biya.-- Ponyobons mots 18:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I believe the article covers several notable aspects from her life. The fact that she is the daughter of a world leader, the accusations of lavishness according to the press, her eviction from the Parisian hotel by the anti-Sardinard Brigade, her controversial comments as noted in the press since 2020, and her coming out which has been noted in the international media. As far as I am aware, this figure has consistently received attention from reliable sources for several years now. ―Howard • 🌽33 11:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- So I don't understand how the person is to be considered as only having 1 notable event. ―Howard • 🌽33 11:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- How much of this coverage would she have received if not for her parents? Being the daughter of a world leader is not itself grounds for notability, accusations of lavishness are par for the course for the families of top politicians, and coming out of the closet is something the LGBTQIA+ community does regularly enough that it's only news because of her parents. That leaves the hotel eviction as the only event involving her that could possibly help for notability, and in cases like this where the subject is and remains a private person we err towards not having an article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- How is this not WP:BLP1E? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Kalki 2898 AD
change box office from 700 crore to 732 crore Smtsayantan (talk) 14:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- In India we use Film's box office as per Bollywood Hungama and Box Office India. Firstpost is not usable per all previous Indian film statistics. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Kalki 2898 AD is only semi-protected. Remember to provide reliable sources for your claim. Favonian (talk) 16:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.