User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
Languages | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
Userbox | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Search user languages |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...[edit]
Created[edit]
- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly[edit]
My other accounts[edit]
- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks[edit]
Administrative backlog[edit]
WP:AIV
Reports[edit]
Bot-reported[edit]
- Enriexr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:49, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Filter blocked attempt at adding a name to an article. Not vandalism. --Office7724 (talk) 20:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Added attempt2 because the filter stopped a potentially libelous addition to the article that would have had to be RevDel'ed if it had gotten through. Daniel Case (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Filter blocked attempt at adding a name to an article. Not vandalism. --Office7724 (talk) 20:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:18c:8c80:5ed0::7d0f (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. One edit, which may have been good faith anyway, blocked by the filter. Daniel Case (talk) 21:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Terminator3883 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – A Sockpuppet account of previous users under the same account that were all blocked ScholarMate1, H3r3cookiecookie38, and ZipthatChop for vandalism at multiple articles including at Hausa people. The User Terminator3883 returned just 10 minutes ago after being blocked for vandalism at Ethiopians and Hausa people. They spammed the same edit summary at my talk page [1] to justify their unsourced edits at the Hausa people article. Cookiemonster1618 (talk 22:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
User-reported[edit]
- 2601:182:501:72C0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – longterm disruption. FMSky (talk) 20:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:53, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Duijata (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Stewart Bale: account is being used only for promotional purposes. Sorry if this is too early for reporting. My ad blocker is saying the link they posted is harmful. Knitsey (talk) 22:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- PacificArtLeague (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Pacific Art League (diff): account is being used only for promotional purposes. C F A 💬 22:53, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 22:54, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs[edit]
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP[edit]
Bot-reported[edit]
- Wikiped!a V2 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used ! instead of i attempting to skip filter: Wikipedia. Violating string: wikipedia v2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Mental abuse (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "abuse" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Збуда (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment: No problem with this username. — kashmīrī TALK 21:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
User-reported[edit]
- St Pauls International (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:St Paul International Lutheran Church Tokyo. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ann Essentials (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:Ann Essentials. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
List of Blackpink live performances[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Re-request due to persistent addition of unsourced and/or poorly sourced materials for concert's figures by IP range (2A01:E0A:AB0:4820:0:0:0:0/64). Warning is impossible as they're using dynamic IP which changes every day hence reaching level 4 warning is impossible. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2A01:E0A:AB0:4820:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article and Born Pink World Tour for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 21:54, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Master of Reality[edit]
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:47, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most of the disruptive edits are coming from IPs; ECP doesn't seem necessary yet. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- To resolve the apparent contradiction above: the article's history shows that edit warring and disruption are not just recent phenomena; they have continued since the last (very short) protection on the article expired last December. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: Reviewing the history, which I did, the content dispute includes multiple extended confirmed editors on both sides. I don't think semi-protection or ECP is appropriate here. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- If you think it isn't warranted, go ahead and lift it. I was looking beyond the content dispute ... there has been persistent IP disruption on this page since that last protection expired. Certainly it would be easier for the EC editors if they didn't have to worry about putting out those fires while trying to work things out. Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: Reviewing the history, which I did, the content dispute includes multiple extended confirmed editors on both sides. I don't think semi-protection or ECP is appropriate here. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- To resolve the apparent contradiction above: the article's history shows that edit warring and disruption are not just recent phenomena; they have continued since the last (very short) protection on the article expired last December. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Daniel Case: Using semi-protection seems contradictory to
Semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred or to privilege registered users over unregistered users in (valid) content disputes.
in WP:SEMI and there's also similar language in WP:ECP. Let's try full protection as an alternative approach as suggested in Wikipedia:Protection policy § Content disputes. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Rogers Plaza[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Strongly suspect WP:COI, keeps adding a store directory, indiscriminate info, and images clearly not belonging to them. See [2]. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's a single IP address editor and there's an active discussion on ANI. If anything, a block would be the first step here, but I'm going to leave that to the administrators looking into this on ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
List of centenarians[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism, particularly today. Bremps... 21:49, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Bremps: Did you request protection for the correct article? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:54, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- D'oh! List of living centenarians Bremps... 21:56, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Done. List of living centenarians is semi-protected protected for 1 year due to repeated and long-term disruptive editing and vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- D'oh! List of living centenarians Bremps... 21:56, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Loki (rapper)[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 23:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Sinéad O'Connor[edit]
Protected in accordance with WP:BLP over a decade ago. However, this person is deceased. Does BLP policy still has to apply to this page?197.2.30.146 (talk) 16:08, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Depends on if there are any lingering controversies, per WP:BDP. BLP protections extend to anywhere from six months to two years postmortem. I'd argue that this may be a case where unprotection could be tried. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Courcelles: as the protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am not sure he would respond given his last activity was 3 months ago.197.2.30.146 (talk) 18:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: In this case, it seems like Casliber should probably be considered the protecting administrator. It looks like Courcelles was restoring Casliber's semi-protection after the pending changes trial ended. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- And he hasn't edited in a couple of weeks, either. Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm uncomfortable declaring them to be "inactive" at this point since some people go on vacations that are several weeks long. Could we give them several days to respond to the ping here? Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:37, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- And he hasn't edited in a couple of weeks, either. Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- The protection template has changed several times over the course of the article's history, but it was protected due to vandalism, not under WP:BLP. Also, we don't lift protections made due to WP:BLP or under WP:CT/BLP automatically some period of time after a person dies. Protections are lifted following WP:UNPROTPOL. As Casliber who originally applied the protection is still active, they should be asked first. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Courcelles: as the protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- The protection log on that page doesn't say anything about BLP, it is protected due to excessive vandalism. — xaosflux Talk 20:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- That was before CTOPS existed. Any long-term BLP protections still active are, it seems we have been doing, treated as CTOPS actions now. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case:
Any long-term BLP protections still active are, it seems we have been doing, treated as CTOPS actions now.
Could you please clarify what policy or guideline says that? WP:PP independently allows indefinite protection of articles experiencingheavy and persistent
WP:BLP violations. We should try to stick to established interpretations of policies. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)- It's true that we don't have to choose CTOPS protection for a BLP, even when we make it indefinite. But the longer the term, the previous terms, and the more times it's previously been protected, the more admins aware of CTOPS are choosing to invoke that even if the main issue is persistent vandalism.
- Of course, since we're now in BRDP territory with this article, as noted above, this discussion is really beside the point. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't follow the point you are trying to make, but I'm inclined to unprotect the article given the lack of disruption and WP:PP allows that once we've given Casliber the chance to respond. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:45, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- On second thought, Daniel Case and Daniel Quinlan, following your dialogue and following the fact that the page was once PC configured for a year, which also occurred over a decade ago, any opinions on whether temporary pending protection could be implemented instead of complete unprotection from the get-go?197.2.30.146 (talk) 15:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'd argue that it's been protected for so long that we can/should start with unprotection first and then ramp up as necessary. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- +1 as well. I really don't see any lingering controversies—"Fight the real enemy!" was years ago, and she didn't start any more of those this century. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'd argue that it's been protected for so long that we can/should start with unprotection first and then ramp up as necessary. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- On second thought, Daniel Case and Daniel Quinlan, following your dialogue and following the fact that the page was once PC configured for a year, which also occurred over a decade ago, any opinions on whether temporary pending protection could be implemented instead of complete unprotection from the get-go?197.2.30.146 (talk) 15:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- +1, opting for at least trying unprotection; re-protection at need is just a click away. Lectonar (talk) 13:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't follow the point you are trying to make, but I'm inclined to unprotect the article given the lack of disruption and WP:PP allows that once we've given Casliber the chance to respond. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:45, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case:
- That was before CTOPS existed. Any long-term BLP protections still active are, it seems we have been doing, treated as CTOPS actions now. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Unprotected. It's been over a day since pinging Casliber who hasn't edited since 25 June 2024, and there seems to be strong consensus to try unprotection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
0 protected edit requests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
15 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for accountcreator |
---|
Account creator[edit]User:S-Aura[edit]
Hello! Wikipedians, I'm S-Aura with over three years of experience and extended confirmed user rights. I'd like to request an account creation on Wikipedia. Thank you! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]User:C1K98V[edit]
Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
User:Zhing'za zï Ïnin[edit]
I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser for making otherwise-tedious edits to replace widely-used raster images with vectorized equivalents. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
User:SerChevalerie[edit]
Previously had AWB rights, back to editing now. SerChevalerie (talk) 07:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Bugnawfang[edit]
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights Hi. I'm Bugnawfang. Lately, I have been editing on articles about some places in the Philippines. Recently, however, the Negros Island Region was created again after a law was signed by the president of the Philippines. Hence, there are 19 cities and 44 municipalities' pages that still have the old "Central Visayas (Region VII)" and "Western Visayas (Region VI)" region template tags. I am aware that my edits do not meet the threshold, but I do want to update these pages, and making edits one-by-one on these pages is tedious on its own. With this, I may request for the permission to use AWB to add the "Negros Island Region" template on these pages. Bugnawfang (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC) User:AirshipJungleman29[edit]
Would be useful to make tedious edits. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC) User:John[edit]
Been on hiatus for a couple of years and my access was revoked. I used to enjoy using the typo fixing facility and might like to try it again. John (talk) 14:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed[edit] |
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit]User:FightStranger[edit]
I understand that i does not completed the 500 edits and 30 days on Wikipedia but, i created a account on 1 April 2021 and completed 890 edits but i forgotten the user name and password of the account, i doesn't restored account, i realy a experienced editor of Wikipedia please give me Extended confirmed rights, I request you, i really completed 890 edits on my previous account but i forgotten the user name. So please give me extended confirmed rights on this account other than that account I know you will decline this request but I am making the request because you understand my grief and give it to me, that you not give the rights i will go to depression FightStranger (talk) 09:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Microplastic Consumer[edit]
|
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover[edit] |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]User:Extorc[edit]
I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>> Extorc.talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC) User:HRShami[edit]
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC) User:Evilfreethinker[edit]
I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC) User:Suntooooth[edit]
I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\ User:SparrowQ[edit]
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
User:KingSkyLord[edit]
I have been a long-time editor on this site for 7 years with lots of experience creating articles and participating in AfD discussions. I plan to use this permission to help clear the backlog and provide feedback to editors for their new articles, regardless of whether their article is notable or not. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC) User:Noorullah21[edit]
I've had previous experience, had it on trial period for a month during the back-drive, and I feel like I can especially do more. Noorullah (talk) 11:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC) User:Xegma[edit]
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Iwaqarhashmi[edit]
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Garsh2[edit]
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
User:KingSkyLord[edit]
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC) User:Wikishovel[edit]
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]User:Cwater1[edit]
I would like to help out reviewing edits before it is published as an live article. I do have good experience. I am aware that statements must be sourced, and I know what is considered nonsense.Cwater1 (talk) 18:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Cwater1 (talk) 18:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
User:DandelionAndBurdock[edit]
I'd just like an extra tool in my vandal fighting utility belt. Plus signing off on good edits would make me feel helpful. -- D'n'B-t -- 17:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
User:RodRabelo7[edit]
I've been a rollbacker for some time now, and when I patrol the recent changes, it's not at all uncommon to come across pending revisions. Thus, I imagine that having the permission of a pending changes reviewer would help me in anti-vandalism activities and, even more, reduce the backlog and the work of other volunteers. Helping directly on Special:PendingChanges is also a possibility, of course. Thank you, RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC) User:Madeforall1[edit]
Im requesting pending changes reviewer rights because I wish to review some changes made by inexperienced users, I’ll be fully active and really want to get this right. Madeforall1 (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Randomstaplers[edit]
I'm starting to review pages for copyvios, and, as a result, I'm starting to encounter reviewer-protected pages. (If the article on Rotten Tomatoes wasn't a backwards-copy, I might have been hosed.) In any case, I hope my experience across multiple Wikimedia projects demonstrates the competence needed for this permission. ⸺RandomStaplers 00:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC) User:Gabriel601[edit]
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]User:Rkieferbaum[edit]
Hi there! Requesting rollback rights to be able to use different tools for reverting vandalism. I'm open to any questions or feedback on my editing and counter-vandalism actions. Cheers. Rkieferbaum (talk) 11:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
User:245CMR[edit]
User:Madeforall1[edit]
Greetings, I wish to get the Rollback right because I want to fight vandalism and revert edits that goes Wikipedia’s guidelines, also I want to be able to revert edits frm users who aren’t sure of what they are doing most especially IP user. Madeforall1 (talk) 10:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Apollogetticax[edit]
Hello! I have nearly a month of experience recent-changes patrolling. While on some days you may not see any, on other days (especially my first two weeks), I spend over 6 hours patrolling. I also have around (or over) 250 mainspace edits. I would like to have rollback to help me revert vandalism faster, and with the RC script, as it catches vandalism very quickly, but it requires rollback to revert the vandalism. So far I have to navigate diffs to reach the vandalism, and that takes too much time. Otherwise I use the old-school recent changes and use diffs, but it just as slow as the script. In both cases I use Twinkle, if you were wondering. I have experience with what is vandalism and what isn't, and I can tell what type of vandalism the edit is (if it is), and which warning to use and at which level. If you deny my request due to inexperience, I will understand. Apollogetticax|talk 23:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor[edit]User:Jackdude101[edit]
I am heavily involved with editing route diagram templates and adding new items to template:rail-interchange, with a special focus on rail lines in France for the upcoming 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris starting later this month. I have made multiple edit requests there in the past, and very recently after refamiliarizing myself with the process, I've started to do it again. I would like the ability to edit that template directly so I don't have to rely on others to do it for me. Jackdude101 talk cont 07:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
Immediate requests[edit]
Category | Entries |
---|---|
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 90 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 49 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 0 |
Deletion[edit]
Category | Entries |
---|---|
Articles for deletion | 476 |
Templates for deletion | 92 |
Categories for deletion | 159 |
Wikipedia files for discussion | 41 |
All redirects for discussion | 209 |
Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 24 |
Possible copyright violations | 44 |
All articles proposed for deletion | 137 |
All files proposed for deletion | 14 |
Unsorted AfD debates | 2 |
All files with the same name on Commons | 63 |
Image copyright problems[edit]
Category | Entries |
---|---|
Orphaned non-free use | 377 |
Unknown copyright status | 36 |
Unknown source | 26 |
No non-free use rationale | 2 |
Replaceable non-free use images | 15 |
Disputed non-free use images | 12 |
Page protection[edit]
Category | Entries |
---|---|
Protected | 10 |
Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,221 |
Fully protected user and user talk pages | 444 |
Protected against vandalism | 4 |
Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
Semi-protected | 2,555 |
Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup[edit]
General cleanup | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
---|---|---|
All pages needing cleanup | 34,381 | 0.5 |
All articles needing rewrite | 5,756 | 0.08 |
All articles needing expert attention | 1,298 | 0.02 |
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 38,512 | 0.56 |
Reference problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All pages needing factual verification | 10,793 | 0.16 |
All articles with unsourced statements | 521,362 | 7.61 |
All articles lacking sources | 86,851 | 1.27 |
All unreferenced BLPs | 848 | 0.08 |
All articles needing additional references | 459,726 | 6.71 |
All articles needing references cleanup | 4,377 | 0.06 |
All articles lacking in-text citations | 104,787 | 1.53 |
All articles with dead external links | 300,107 | 4.38 |
Image cleanup problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
Wikipedia files lacking a description | 138 | - |
Wikipedia files with unknown source | 18 | - |
Other problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All articles to be merged | 1,868 | 0.03 |
All articles to be split | 795 | 0.01 |
Unsorted Stubs | 1 | - |
Stub categories | 19,212 | - |
All uncategorized pages | 589 | 0.01 |
All orphaned articles | 56,815 | 0.83 |
All articles needing copy edit | 2,922 | 0.04 |
All articles with style issues | 19,527 | 0.28 |
All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,737 | 0.04 |
All articles that may contain original research | 16,545 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous[edit]
Category | Entries |
---|---|
Requested moves | 235 |
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,639 |
All accuracy disputes | 15,689 |
Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
Articles with invalid ISSNs | 2 |
All articles to be expanded | 66,084 |
Special pages[edit]
Maintenance reports | Information |
---|---|
Broken redirects | |
Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
Long pages | |
New pages | New page patrol |
New pages feed | Page curation |
Protected pages | Protection policy |
Short pages | |
Uncategorized | Categorization |
Uncategorized cats | |
Uncategorized templates | |
Unused categories | |
Unused files (images) | |
Unused templates | |
Without interwiki links | |
Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing[edit]
Hong Kong[edit]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4e/Hknight_small.jpg/800px-Hknight_small.jpg)
Misc[edit]
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. |