Jump to content

User talk:Jason One

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --John Kerry + John Edwards 2004 21:57, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Good job!

[edit]

Hey Jason One! I just wanted to drop by to applaud you on your tireless efforts concerning the italizing of video game titles. Good job! pie4all88 20:37, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

No problem; you deserved it :) By the way, you seem interested in video game-related articles, so I thought I'd point out the Gaming Collaboration of the week if you haven't seen it already. Anyways, see you around the 'pedia! pie4all88 21:46, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Sounds good :) I'm trying to do something similar, as are others, but it's hard to do so if you haven't played the game that the article is on :S pie4all88 00:20, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Barnstar

[edit]

Just in case you didn't notice or don't have your user page on your watchlist, I awarded you a barnstar! Andre (talk) 03:15, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)

Well-deserved! Jason One: the unstoppable Wikipedia characterisation/italicisation machine! Sockatume 06:50, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

[edit]

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Thanks

[edit]

I would like to thank you for to correct and to check speeling in my articles. Big thanks (english is not my first language). --Mateusc 09:10, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin

[edit]

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 22:59, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

I noticed that these articles:

that you worked on in the past are now are up for deletion. Would you vote in favor of keeping these articles? They show the history of the advancement of video game graphics over time and are useful as a source of images for graphics for video game articles. --ShaunMacPherson 19:59, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting your opnion about this dispute. Lot of POV-Pushing, the article is currently blocked. --GroundZero 00:01, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of the Daily Show guests AFD

[edit]

As a contributor of these lists you may wish to vote: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Daily Show guests (2nd nomination). Cburnett 01:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man

[edit]

Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 01:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Pokémon by Stage" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Pokémon by Stage. Since you had some involvement with the List of Pokémon by Stage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Quint(Megaman Character)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Quint(Megaman Character). Since you had some involvement with the Quint(Megaman Character) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:37, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]