Talk:George Washington
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George Washington article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41Auto-archiving period: 60 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments before commenting, and read through the list of highlighted discussions below before starting a new one:
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
FYI: Change in URL for the Washington Papers held at UVA
FYI to anyone editing any George Washington connected articles.
- The old URL was http://gwpapers.virginia.edu.
- URL has been changed, the NEW URL is https://washingtonpapers.org/.
Shearonink (talk) 13:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Birth date
I'd just point out the Anton Chekhov biography gives both old style and new style dates. Wis2fan (talk) 03:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- The most recent substantial discussion of the Julian/Gregorian issue in this talk page can be found at Talk:George Washington/Archive 38#Birthdate again!. That discussion links to several older discussions, so I guess people have been tweaking this for a long time. However, that discussion isn't the last word; I think that people have been tweaking the dates without checking or modifying that discussion.
Right now, the first sentence does not mention the Julian date, but the infobox does. I think that this is backwards:the article should mention the Julian date (in a Note), but the infobox, which is supposed to be an ultra-lean summary of summaries, should not. That is the way it is done in Anton Chekhov. But that's just off the top of my head. I haven't yet looked at those old discussions from this talk page to check if I am missing something. Bruce leverett (talk) 01:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)- The article does not mention the Julian date in the first sentence, but does mention it in a note to the first sentence of the "Early life (1732–1752)" section. Sorry for confusion that I may have caused by missing this.
- The article gives Washington's birth date twice in the text, plus once in the infobox. This is probably unnecessary, but not unheard of, see MOS:BIRTHDATE.
- There is an extensive footnote about the Julian date on the text giving his birth date in the Early life section. The footnote is excessive, insofar as it explains the date change; instead it should just link to Old Style and New Style dates. Also, I think that this footnote should have been attached to the first sentence of the article, rather than to the sentence in the Early life section.
- There is another footnote about the Julian date on the birth date in the infobox. It is undesirable to clutter the infobox this way; the infobox should only be a summary of "key facts", see MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. Bruce leverett (talk) 02:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
First sentence
Since when is the first sentence supposed to be a list of occupations? My understanding of MOS:LEAD is that the first sentence is supposed to explain why the topic is notable. Washington isn't notable for being a planter; he's notable for leading the army and being the first president. Being a planter isn't even distant third; if he weren't already notable, nobody would remember that he was a planter. It's OK to give a little background in the lead paragraphs, but the first sentence should hit the two high points, and then the rest of the first paragraph could cover a few lesser items, such as his service in the French and Indian war and his leading the constitutional convention.
What about "Founding Father"? There is no authoritative list of Founding Fathers -- this is just a link to one of our other articles, Founding Fathers of the United States, which mentions several dozen people, and attempts make something sensible out of a very loosely defined term. I don't see how it is helpful to link to that article in the first sentence of George Washington. Maybe later in the lead?
Of course, looking at John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and others, I see that we have made a similar hash of their lead paragraphs. Gotta start somewhere, I guess. Bruce leverett (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Founding Father defines Washington and seems in the appropriate spot, but yes, planter could be moved further down. He did many other things too, all notable in his life but as you point out, not defining as stand-alone frontline notability. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:36, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Careful, there are editors who would argue that "planter" is central and accurate for defining who/what Washington was, and that moving the term further down or especially replacing it with "farmer" is tantamount to racial and socioeconomic whitewashing of Washington. Drdpw (talk) 23:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Drdpw, I didn't know it was so controversial. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- On further reading and reflection, I agree on the treatment of Founding Father. It isn't as loosely defined as I had thought.
- Rereading the lead paragraphs, I see that we don't say anything about Washington being a planter (or farmer) except in the first sentence. This is too little as well as too much. It doesn't belong in the first sentence, but it has to be in the lead, and the lead should mention that he was a slaveowner, since slavery is mentioned at length in the article. As for "planter" vs. "farmer", I will look at how some sources describe him. Bruce leverett (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Going through the list of U.S. Presidents, I realized that almost all of them use a "list of occupations". The only exceptions that I found were Millard Fillmore, William Howard Taft, and Harry S. Truman. Seeing this doesn't change my assessment that it's a bad idea, but I guess I will have to take it to Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject United States Presidents. Bruce leverett (talk) 13:38, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Careful, there are editors who would argue that "planter" is central and accurate for defining who/what Washington was, and that moving the term further down or especially replacing it with "farmer" is tantamount to racial and socioeconomic whitewashing of Washington. Drdpw (talk) 23:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Recent edits concerning a Washington apprenticeship to Hume
This edit introduced the concept that GW served an apprenticeship for two years under Hume. This appears to be incorrect as Washington received his license from W&M in 1749. If he did indeed serve some type of apprenticeship starting in 1748, at the very least it did not last for two years since he was appointed County Surveyor in 1749. County Surveyors were their own separate legal entity and answered to no one within the Colonial government. I took a close look at the two new refs introduced in the above linked edit and they do not firmly support the claim that Washington was Hume's apprentice. Working with someone, being an Assistant, is not the same as being an Apprentice (see St. George’s History, Fredericksburg, VA - but let's discuss. - Shearonink (talk) 14:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Former good article nominees
- GA-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in People
- GA-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in People
- GA-Class vital articles in People
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (military) articles
- Top-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Top-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- GA-Class biography (core) articles
- Core biography articles
- Top-importance biography articles
- Past Biography collaborations
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class United States Constitution articles
- Top-importance United States Constitution articles
- WikiProject United States Constitution persons
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class national militaries articles
- National militaries task force articles
- GA-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- GA-Class Indian military history articles
- Indian military history task force articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Spanish military history articles
- Spanish military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- GA-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- GA-Class American politics articles
- Top-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- GA-Class Libertarianism articles
- Low-importance Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- GA-Class Virginia articles
- Top-importance Virginia articles
- WikiProject Virginia articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Top-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Top-importance
- GA-Class District of Columbia articles
- High-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- District of Columbia articles with to-do lists
- GA-Class American Revolutionary War articles
- American Revolutionary War task force articles
- American Revolutionary War articles with to-do lists
- United States military history articles with to-do lists
- GA-Class U.S. Presidents articles
- Top-importance U.S. Presidents articles
- WikiProject U.S. Presidents articles
- U.S. Presidents articles with to-do lists
- GA-Class United States Government articles
- High-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- United States Government articles with to-do lists
- Past U.S. collaborations of the Month
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class Pritzker Military Library-related articles
- Top-importance Pritzker Military Library-related articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press