Talk:Pleasant Dreams
![]() | Pleasant Dreams has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 27, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Pleasant Dreams/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 23:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: CrowzRSA
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for WP:WTW:
Check for WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
excellent (Thorough check on Google.)
![]() Check for WP:RS:
|
![]() Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:
|
- c. No original research:
Done
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
b. Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (NFC with a valid FUR)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA (minor issues – Januray typo & "Prior to going working with , the Ramones' had … " something missing ). The prose quality in particular is meticulous and engrossing. Thanks, CrowzRSA, very much for your conscientious contributions.
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Seabuckthorn, I really appreciate the swiftness and dedication to reviewing for me!! I also have fixed the minor issues you found in the prose. Again, thanks!! CrowzRSA 00:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Pleasant Dreams page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Pleasant Dreams" page.