Talk:Solar System
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Solar System article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Solar System is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Solar System is the main article in the Solar System series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 9, 2007, and on October 29, 2023. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Other talk page banners | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Clean up
[edit]I just made some major changes to the article. The most notable of which are:
- Convert small headers listing individual bodies into bullet points, conserving the links using {{visible anchor}}
- Merge oddball sections "Comparison with extrasolar systems" and "Location", create a new section for a general overview (which is basically a repackaged version of "Comparison with extrasolar systems" with some irrelevant information transferred to other parts of the article). Move "General characteristics" down for readability.
- Remove AU to kilometers and miles conversion, strictly only use AU. Also replaced "approximately X AU from the Sun" with clear aphelion and perihelion data.
There are a few parts of this article that I still feel lacking, such as the description of individual bodies or some subsections in "General characteristics". What do you think about the article as it is? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 08:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I've restored the comparison with extrasolar systems section. It made no sense to take a perfectly good descriptive title and rename it withe the meaningless "overview".
I've also restored the location section. Celestial neighbourhood does not belong in a section called general characteristics of the solar system. Fdfexoex (talk) 07:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Made sense, but I always feel like it is an odd-ball thing... CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 08:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- I merged the "extrasolar systems" section to the general characteristics of the solar system. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 09:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- My dear, @Fdfexoex, what exactly would it be "overview" for you? Just a asking. 45.233.183.235 (talk) 13:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Also I just fixed picture placement. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: English Composition 1102 085
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2024 and 2 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jgleana (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Jgleana (talk) 03:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Jgleana Hey! Do you want some help? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 12:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, I noticed you commented this 1 month ago, what'sup? 45.233.183.235 (talk) 13:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Poorly-cited infobox
[edit]The infobox for this article has an atrociously poor level of citation, and is utterly inadequate for an FA-class article. I think it should be draftified until the citation issue is resolved. Praemonitus (talk) 14:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Praemonitus Cited most of them except for the galactic inclination info. I have no idea where it came from. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Same for the Hill sphere. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I just made a to-do box on top, feel free to add anything more into it – CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Same for the Hill sphere. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think that a few uncited numbers in such article justify draftification. Artem.G (talk) 20:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Could you tell me where the problem is? I ain't any FA-class specialist, but I can't found the mistake here, maybe I could be wrong, but it is not clearly wrong. 45.233.183.235 (talk) 13:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Overall, many things need to be clarified here, so that in the future this article will become so unreliable, that it's gonna be almost impossible to redeem this later, It is always good to avoid this kind of referential stagnation—referential, in this sense, of reference sources. 45.233.183.235 (talk) 14:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Are we done now?
[edit]Over the last month, this article has been completely rewritten from the ground up, without discussion or peer review. I think we need to take stock of what has happened. Perhaps bring in a disinterested party. Serendipodous 12:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't agree that it has been completely rewritten, but there have been a significant number of changes. I've been making another pass through and trying to tweak the results. It mostly seems to be in decent shape, FA-wise. The one glaring omission I see is there is no mention of planetary migration in the "Formation and evolution" section, but the migration of Neptune is mentioned twice. Praemonitus (talk) 14:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've attempted to address the last. Praemonitus (talk) 12:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
What's the point of changing the "asteroid belt" topic header to "asteroids" if you're not going to mention other asteroids?
[edit]Asteroids within the asteroid belt are not covered. Serendipodous 22:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- There's some discussion at the end of the section. Praemonitus (talk) 14:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind. I'll do it. Serendipodous 16:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Distance conversions?
[edit]In some spots, distances in AU are presented without conversion, while others convert it to miles and km. It's inconsistent. The size of an AU is well defined at the start of the "Distances and scales" section. Do you think we can use AU thereafter without the intermittent conversions? An example is the Asteroid belt section, where the inner and outer radius from the Sun is converted, then AU is used for orbital distances without conversion. The benefit of the AU in this context is that it provides a convenient scale. There shouldn't be a need to keep converting it; that just adds clutter. Praemonitus (talk) 18:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- agree, AUs should be enough. there is no way anyone can imagine what (15 billion km; 9.3 billion mi) is, 100 AU does the same job and is more concise. Artem.G (talk) 19:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support removing conversions. The distances in kilometers are simply too large, astronomical units are more appropriate to such large scales. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- As a note, a lot of other prominent astronomy articles employ this too (e.g. Pluto); should we remove conversions there as well? ArkHyena (talk) 01:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well the pluto article just jumps in and starts using AU without defining it, so I'm not sure. Perhaps that's a more general discussion for WP:AST? If there's a consensus, it could go in the astronomy style guide. Praemonitus (talk) 03:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Why do we need a Spaceflight section?
[edit]I'm unclear why this section is needed. It discusses spaceflight maneuvering, rather than the properties of the Solar System. The previous section already mentions the history of exploration via spacecraft. This discussion can be better handled via a link in the "See also" section. Praemonitus (talk) 13:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I support removing most of the content; some of the info relevant to major missions could also be merged w/ the above subsection. ArkHyena (talk) 18:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
bow shock
[edit]A factual issue: this article states the Solar System creates a bow shock within the surrounding ISM, whereas the Heliosphere#Bow_shock article-section states this has been determined to be not the case. The Heliosphere page's applicable reference is more recent than that of this article. 98.1.3.105 (talk) 17:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input. However, I don't think a bow shock has been completely ruled out.[1][2] Praemonitus (talk) 23:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia featured articles
- FA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Solar System featured content
- Top-importance Featured topics articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page twice
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-2 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Physical sciences
- FA-Class level-2 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-2 vital articles in Physical sciences
- FA-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- FA-Class Astronomy articles
- Top-importance Astronomy articles
- FA-Class Astronomy articles of Top-importance
- FA-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- FA-Class Solar System articles
- Top-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists