Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

6 October 2024

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< October 05	October 07 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Vitthal Ramji Shinde

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional. The references don't add to the notability Gauravs 51 (talk) 06:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Krishna Bantawa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very promotional article that doesn't meet WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Literature, and Nepal. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imaginary Cloud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an Unipessoal Lda that's on the FT1000 list of fastest growing companies... as rank 727. Outside of those WP:ORGTRIV awards in that section, there is essentially zero coverage of the company. I'd almost A7 it. Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and Portugal. Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jhala dynasty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is another installment of a WP:WALLEDGARDEN on the Jhala family created by a now-blocked sockmaster. (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harpal Dev Makwana for an example of a deleted article in this set and Jhala (clan) for an appropriately sourced version not created by a sockmaster. The core sources for these articles are books of purported genealogy published by Jhala family descendants. This article takes a legendary genealogy and launders the sources to present it as history:

The first set of sources are the unreliable ones:

Genealogy, Archive, Image: Interpreting Dynastic History in Western India is edited by two Jhala family members, including one who presents himself as heir and descendent of Harpal Dev and the current head of the so-called "dynasty." It includes fantastic stories from the vahi (legendary geneaologies of high-caste Indian families), for example one figure defeating a ghost in battle and marrying a goddess who supernaturally rescues their children from an elephant.
Ulian's Rajput is a self-published book that repeats and embellishes the same rather fantastic legends.
Kumarapala-prabandha appears to be mostly a repetition of legends
This book is self-published through vanity press Notion Press.

Meanwhile, the independent sources do not present any of this legendary genealogy.

Ramusack's The Indian Princes and Their States has a single WP:TRIVIALMENTION of the Jhalas (page 73)
Naravane's The Rajputs of Rajputana has a single paragraph describing the Jhalas as a "minor clan."
Singhji's The Rajputs of Saurashtra discusses the Jhala Rajputs but says of the earlier stories, "Bardic tales about their migrations from the Himalayan region to Sindh seem to contain little truth."

Additional sources include WP:RAJ-era surveys of questionable reliability and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in a gazetteer.

In short, what WP:SIGCOV we have on the Jhala dynasty includes legend repeated by WP:SPS and WP:COI sources. The independent coverage, such as it is, does not establish facts about this dynasty as presented in the article. With an adequately sourced article on the Jhala (clan) I think the best approach to this compromised article is WP:TNT. Bottom line: Fails WP:V and WP:GNG for lack of SIGCOV in independent, reliable, secondary sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and India. Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Looking at the article page, it does not seem to contain any far-fetched claims except the Origin section which should be renamed to 'Origin legend' or clarified that it is a traditional legend.

Also, the argument for unreliabity of the source Genealogy, Archive, Image: Interpreting Dynastic History in Western India being that the co-author is a Jhala doesn't seem valid considering that there are probably a million of Jhala people and shouldn't make them ineligible to write on the subject. Both the authors are also scholars in anthropolgy with Jhala having served as the Professor of Anthropology at Temple University as per the linked press release.

I do believe more context can be added regarding the tradtional sources the authors have used. But deleting the article would be an extreme step. The subject is very much notable. Many later kingdoms, states and principalities claimed descent from the members of this dynasty. Thank you. Krayon95 (talk) 09:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with Genealogy, Archive, Image isn’t only that it’s written by Jhalas. It’s that one of the authors claims to be the head of the dynasty (see link above) and the book is an effort to launder legends into a historical account. The other reliable sources to discuss the Jhalas do not do this, as I noted above. The appropriately sourced Jhala (clan) article covers this ground without retailing legends as facts. Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Mostly poor to unreliable sources to WP:RAJ and does not meet WP:HISTRS and the somewhat reliable sources have entry to passing mention with no WP:SIGCOV. RangersRus (talk) 21:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Delete due to not meeting general guidelines of WP:DEPTH, WP:SYNTH, and WP:RSSELF. Fails in WP:GNG, poorly built narratives using Non-reliable sources of British-Raj and sources have only passing mention as Book Headlines. ®asteem Talk 20:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Velpula Sarayu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. I would have possibly declined for the second time, but it does appear that the creator has made up their mind that she ranks the 6th in an unknown women category of a chess competition. The subject has participated in non notable competition, and has appeared in few sources, but there aren't WP:SIGCOV. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Sports, and India. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Telangana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination. But why did you accept this AfC draft? TrangaBellam (talk) 16:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Non-notable chess player who played in non-nontable tournaments and has not made a significant and substantial achievement nationally or internationally worthy of notice to warrant a page on. Fails WP:NBIO, WP:SPORTCRIT, WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 21:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. OP's acceptance of the AfC draft only to nominate it for deletion a minute later makes me concerned something WP:POINTy is going on. AfD does not exist to be used as a tool for making some kind of point to another editor. It's a process that costs a lot of time. If OP thought the topic was not notable, then OP should've saved us all the trouble by not accepting the submission at AfC. In any event, the topic apparently had one of the most sensational results in chess history, and there's multiple sources covering Sarayu, including in the context of that apparently landmark and sensational showing: [1] [2]. The particular competition's prominence might not personally impress OP (or at least, OP since a minute after accepting the article at AfC), but it apparently impressed people who observe and write about chess. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 08:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per Hydrangeans. Also she was ranked 27th in the world among women and 2nd among girls at her peak rating of 2444, and is still comfortably among the top 100 women and top 10 girls. Sounds pretty notable to me. Bubka42 (talk) 22:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Cheat Expert

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. If sources are found, please ping me. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually Anti-Cheat Expert is a rather notable software in China and there are numerous resources about it in Chinese:

https://www.sohu.com/a/803766128_120840 (ACE was reported by China Game Report)

https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1715266563479839884&wfr=spider&for=pc (PR Newswire's report about the game security summit held by ACE)

http://youxichaguan.com/news/30343.html (ACE was awarded as the best game service company in 2022)

Many popular games had cooperation with Anti-Cheat Expert and lots of gamers know this software. Yogurt moon123 (talk) 06:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://intl.anticheatexpert.com/#/index (the official website-English version)

https://fairplayalliance.org/members/ (showing as a member of fair play alliance as many other notable gaming companies)

https://anticheatexpert.com/#/index (official Chinese website showing that ACE has passed ISO 27001 and ISO 27701)

https://www.cbinsights.com/company/anti-cheat-expert (introduction from cbinsights) Yogurt moon123 (talk) 05:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am not convinced by the sources, simple announcements are insufficient to prove notability. The WP:SIGCOV doesn't seem to be there. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Tencent per zh:游戏安全专家. IgelRM (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table: prepared by User:Aaron Liu, analyzing all sources in the Chinese article and the 4 sources that weren't official websites brought up here]]
https://www.sohu.com/a/803766128_120840	~		No mention in original content	✘ No
http://youxichaguan.com/news/30343.html	~ Basically the Chinese industry's The Game Awards		Only mentioned that it got a prize. May shakily contribute towards some subject-specific guideline.	✘ No
https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1715266563479839884&wfr=spider&for=pc	?	? published on Chinese Medium (website)	no mention	✘ No
https://www.cbinsights.com/company/anti-cheat-expert	? CB Insights is independent but writing looks like press-release copy	RSN discussion	~ one nothing-burger paragraph	? Unknown
https://web.archive.org/web/20191026133418/https://www.techweb.com.cn/onlinegamerim/2018-11-05/2710760.shtml	~ Source is aggregator, original source is independent & famous Chinese game hosting company "Four Three Nine Nine"	ditto		~ Partial
https://news.sina.com.cn/sx/2022-04-15/detail-imcwiwst2031104.shtml	Straight up copies their press release. See Wikipedia:Independent sources#Press releases			✘ No
http://www.gamelook.com.cn/2017/11/311055				✔ Yes
https://cn.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202111/05/WS6184fb41a3107be4979f6d94.html		WP:RSP: may be used, cautiously and with good editorial judgment, [...] as a source for facts about non-political events in mainland China		✔ Yes
ded link				? Unknown
ded link				? Unknown
https://blog.csdn.net/AntiCheatExpert/article/details/126759959#:~:text=%E8%85%BE%E8%AE%AF%E6%B8%B8%E6%88%8F%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E5%8F%91%E5%B8%83	literally from ACE			✘ No
https://www.prnasia.com/lightnews/lightnews-1-77-37383.shtml	美通社=PR Newswire			✘ No
https://news.sina.cn/sx/2023-03-24/detail-imymycye3038331.d.html			n omention	✘ No
https://www.hankyung.com/article/202404227507i		Korea Economic Daily is listed at WP:KO/RS#R		✔ Yes
https://m.inven.co.kr/webzine/wznews.php?idx=298100		? no mention found anywhere on wikipedia		? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Weak keep. Aaron Liu (talk) 02:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree withe the source analysis above. Crosses the line, although the article needs a lot of work. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2026 Colchester City Council election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a planned election for a second-tier local government authority scheduled for nearly two years away. A case of WP:NOTCRYSTAL. AusLondonder (talk) 01:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and England. AusLondonder (talk) 01:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I don't see how this is a case of NOTCRYSTAL? It's an article about an election that is scheduled and expected to happen and has non-trivial and verifiable information. Bluepotato81 (talk) 09:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It actually has no real information about the election. We don't even know if those councillors in the infobox will be contesting the election. AusLondonder (talk) 21:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Same reasons as above. Into oblivion (talk) 21:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - If we already have mentions of everyone who is elected then simply this isn't a case of WP:CRYSTAL — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79lives (talk • contribs) 19:13, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This comment doesn't make any sense unfortunately. AusLondonder (talk) 07:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More explanation and policy consideration in the comments would help.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lectka enantioselective beta-lactam synthesis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A couple of primary sources in the scientific literature do not show this topic meets WP:GNG, nor does it demonstrate that the topic merits a named reaction after the corresponding author. The current content is likely inaccessible to most readers. There may be some content that could be merged into β-Lactam#Synthesis. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OR. The only two sources are obscure papers written by the person for whom the process is named. This is borderline original research - akin to synthesis. We just don’t do that here. Bearian (talk) 08:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into β-Lactam#Synthesis. The fact is that there are reliable sources (and not by Lectka) on this topic, as following: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=O6ATDgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA296&dq=Lectka+enantioselective+beta-lactam+synthesis&ots=ws2tn1YX9x&sig=GYBJX6WsGPmh7IcJp8TF4wEqTOU (Page 311), https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=B4cjEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA78&dq=Lectka+enantioselective+beta-lactam+synthesis&ots=eO8rdQmHOu&sig=MfXw_uyFnnHaBBlk-Gnj5kEcXfc (Page 100), https://doi.org/10.1021/ja012427r, Thus, I don't agree that it violates WP:OR. However, there's indeed no mentioning in the sources of the reaction being named after Lectka, thereby violating WP:GNG, so I would propose a merge. Pygos (talk) 01:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

St Austell Golf Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guideline. None of the sources in the article are reliable or have significant coverage of the subject, and a quick look for more did not turn up anything promising. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Golf, and England. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be a good idea to increase the golf club articles on wikipedia so they match other sports like football? I know this is not the most notible example but it is the club I know most about. LeonKnight (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helaman Jeffs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of standalone notability. Hardly any coverage of the subject; notability is not inherited. (NPP action) C F A 💬 20:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Christianity. C F A 💬 20:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latter Day Saints-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:49, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Multiple references (already found on the article) are stating that he is claiming to be the current head of the FLDS church, I will hunt down some more sources. Thief-River-Faller (talk) 12:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't really matter. There needs be significant coverage in independent, reliable sources in order to meet WP:NBASIC. C F A 💬 14:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rackham (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable corporation that fails GNG (no inherited notability from a product to it's designer), what little coverage exists is routine coverage of corporate changes and going bankrupt. Suggest redirect & merge of relevant content to Confrontation (Rackham), their most popular game. Macktheknifeau (talk) 23:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Macktheknifeau (talk) 23:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I have found several relevant sources that talk about the company's beginnings, and its production numbers at peak operation, before the slide into insolvency began. I've also rewritten the article to make it a bit more coherent. Guinness323 (talk) 02:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on sourcing improvements made by Guinness323. BOZ (talk) 03:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You are aware this needs to be considered under WP:NCORP? That means we need sources that meet WP:CORPDEPTH, which says Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization. Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization. All references must meet WP:SIRS. Nothing on the article seems to meet that. Are we able to find anything better? This is not my !vote as I have not yet conducted my own searches, but we will need more than this. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to a lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, which questions its notability. If the available references are mostly self-published or promotional, it further supports the case for deletion.--Jiaoriballisse (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Confrontation (Rackham): All the sources used in the article are routine coverage concerning acquisitions, insolvency, etc. Conducting a search I couldn't find any reliable sources, which are independent of the subject and which are secondary and cover the company in depth and in detail. That is it appears to fail WP:NCORP TarnishedPath^talk 03:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish exonyms

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indiscriminate mostly unreferenced list of proper names, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Other such articles have recently been deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/French exonyms. toweli (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Geography, Lists, Europe, and Finland. toweli (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Finnish names for random places around the world are not encyclopedic; however, Finnish names for parts of Russia that used to be a part of Finland are encyclopedic, and the same might pertain to Sweden and Norway - Finns/Kven are a recognized minority in Norway and some places in Norway e.g. Porsanger have official Finnish names. Indeed, there is a Finnish exonyms for places in Norway. Perhaps there also should be a Finnish exonyms for places in Russia, and maybe Sweden, and this main Finnish exonyms page be an index for those two/three. Remove the rest. Geschichte (talk) 06:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are also a few nontrivial entries in the Baltic States. —Tamfang (talk) 05:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It might be better to have an article about Toponymy in Karelia instead of focusing on the exonym aspect, as it might be difficult to separate Finnish and Karelian names, and Karelian names are not exonyms anyway. There could also be an article about Toponymy in the Karelian Isthmus, which is a special case, since the all the names were changed there in the 1940s. This would discuss both the old Finnish/Karelian names and the Soviet replacement names. See for example the book reviewed at https://agricolaverkko.fi/review/karjalankannaksen-toponyminen-katastrofi/ Jähmefyysikko (talk) 06:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is reasonable to cull exonyms that are simply a matter of spelling rules (in effect, a transliteration). But the rest are useful. There has been an attempted stealth cull of these pages. There should have been an announcement at least on Talk:Endonym and exonym.OsFish (talk) 05:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There are some good sources discussing Finnish exonyms here:
- https://kaino.kotus.fi/eksonyymit/
- https://kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/ohje/eksonyymit-eli-kansalliset-sovinnaisnimet/ (see the links at the bottom).
- https://kielikello.fi/pahdatista-bagdadiin-ulkomaiset-nimet-suomen-kielessa/

I don't think there is that much useful content in the current article, but a new article could probably be written based on these sources. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 05:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bahirbhoomi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NF, and does not meet GNG either. Htanaungg (talk) 04:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Htanaungg (talk) 04:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brett M. Johnson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no independent RS that provide direct and in-depth secondary coverage of this person. Hell, even the non-independent coverage are mostly trivial mentions that barely has their name appear a few times, interviews being a bit of an exception. I think the only CCS would be the "Senior Fellow in Entrepreneurship" but I find it rather dubious that anybody would seriously claim that's an actual academic position given what the about page says. Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Football, and California. Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:subject has significant coverage including East Anglian Daily Times, New York Times and the Guardian here to meet WP:GNG for their notabilityTesleemah (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can I ask what part of that coverage you find addresses the subject directly and in detail as per WP:SIGCOV Tesleemah? I'm really not seeing it. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grabówka Ukazowa-Hamówka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was generated by a long-inactive bot (Kotbot), no equivalent article exists on the Polish wikipedia Kiwipete (talk) 03:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons as above:

Delete. Kotbot made many errors. Thanks for spotting some likely ones. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harish S. Mehta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a WP:PROMO, fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:BIO. WP:NOTRESUME. Charlie (talk) 04:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Charlie (talk) 04:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:subject has significant coverage to meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:BIO and the company, NASSCOM they founded is notable Tesleemah (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC) 05:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Maverick Effect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The book's page should be deleted as it fails to meet the notability guidelines for books, which require significant, independent coverage. The primary reviews cited to establish the book's notability are compromised due to conflicts of interest: one reviewer, a former brand custodian of a NASSCOM-affiliated company, currently advises on brand reputation to various IT companies in India as declared in the review's byline and actively promotes this book across social media as a part of its portfolio work, while the other is openly declaring himself as a personal friend of the author in the byline, making both reviews biased and unreliable. Furthermore, the remaining coverage consists only of trivial mentions and promotional excerpts, lacking substantial, independent analysis. As such, the book does not meet the criteria for a standalone Wikipedia article. Charlie (talk) 04:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bibliographies, Business, and India. Charlie (talk) 04:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article needs complete rewrite for sure. But I have added urls of 2 independent reviews. Reception section can be rewritten from it. - Nizil (talk) 06:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Get in Line or Get Lined Up

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:NALBUM. I tried to draftify, but the article was recreated. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no sources given at all. The only one I could find was this review, but I'm not sure what it is worth. Either way, not enough for notability. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 04:13, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Hell Rell. Found no reliable coverage beyond the RapReviews piece Chaotic Enby linked (regarded as a reliable source per RSMUSIC). No appearance of an NALBUM pass. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 06:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nolan Sanburn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Fbdave (talk) 03:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of convex regular-faced polyhedra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The list may seem to be redundant, consisted of convex polyhedron's classes in the following: we have five Platonic solids list, we have Archimedean solid and Catalan solid's list, and we have Johnson solids list. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 00:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 October 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Palaeotapirus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to Cerdeño and Ginsburg in 1988, the name Palaeotapirus was invalidated by Depéret in 1904 because the fossils were more closely related to those of Chasmotherium (not a tapirid), and he replaced the genus name for "Tapirus" helveticus with Paratapirus. While this should sound like an easy redirect, the issue is that there seems to be one later-described species Palaeotapirus xiejiaheensis that may still be pending a reassessment. Also, on a side note, "Palaeotapirus yagii" was reclassified to the new genus Plesiotapirus. Whether or not the page should be kept, renamed, or redirected on the basis of one species pending a reassessment is worth discussing. PrimalMustelid (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and Organisms. PrimalMustelid (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]