Talk:Wye River Memorandum

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Israel Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles.
Categorization : Diffuse articles from Category:Companies of Israel.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page.
Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration.
Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005
Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel.
Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah
See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia.
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data.
Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes.
Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention.
Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Wikipedia requested maps in Israel.
NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
Photo : Add pictures to articles in Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel.
Stubs : See Israel stubs.
Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
Other :
- Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary.
- Merge Nahal Rafiah (draft, heb) into Nahal as requested by Wikipedia authority

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Move to Wikisource

Looks like just a full transcript of a political memorandum... AlbinoMonkey ^(Talk) 13:40, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Updated and turned into article

Recent edits and elimination of the diplomatic "bobble-di-gook" with additional links and categories added makes this into a very good NPOV article for now. IZAK 08:26, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Added Pollard issue

I've added the Jonathan Pollard issue to the intro because it was major news at the time and almost caused the deal not to be signed. I think it's very NPOV but feel free to reword as necesary.

The Machine 15:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Wye River Memorandum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Wye River Memorandum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 April 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change dead link in external links section from:

http://www.state.gov/www/regions/nea/981023_interim_agmt.html

To official archive link:

https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/nea/rls/22694.htm

because it is clearly the official archived version of the page from the dead link. If further confirmation is desired, see the archive dot org version of the dead link as it appeared on and before April 26, 2013. Clarification: please nevertheless place in the page the state dot gov archive location of the item. That is now and for the future, in effect, the item itself, while the archive dot org copy is a third party's copy. They're a very good third party but still a third party. I am only elaborating in order to be very clear about my request. As far as I know and imagine, there is not and will not be any controversy over this request. Minopret (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done — IVORK _Discuss 00:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SYNTH and other bad edits

To editor Cachedio: "However, by this point the Palestinian Islamic Jihad had carried out a fatal terrorist attack in Jerusalem and Israel had only implemented stage 1 of the further redeployment (F.R.D.), meaning that it had withdrawn from 2% of Area C instead of the full 13%." The four sources, in order, are (1) a source for the bombing that doesn't mention the Wye River Memorandum or even the Oslo Accords. (2) A source that the Wikipedia community has judged unreliable (and even if they hadn't, the fact that the list comes from the Israeli government rules it out). Besides that, I can't find this bombing on that page, where is it? (3) A dead link to an organization with no particular expertise in the subject (and the original version only had half a sentence on the topic and no mention of bombings), (4) An article by Joel Beinin that doesn't mention the bombing.

You aren't allowed to include unreliable sources whether or not you can find confirmation in another source. Your worst error, though, is to manufacture a relationship between two things without a reliable source that explains the relationship. This is what WP:SYNTH forbids absolutely. It would be just as easy to reword it to imply that the bombing was a reaction to Israel violating the agreement, but we aren't allowed to do that either. Of these four sources, only (4) passes muster. Your edit cannot stand. Zero^talk 04:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Cachedio: The 1999 edition of "Righteous Victims" has nothing relevant on pages 653–654, while the 2001 edition only has something similar about the Sharm ash Sheikh agreement one year later on those pages. I'll give you a short time to explain what I'm missing since otherwise I'll revert you again. Zero^talk 13:13, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]