Talk:Richard D. James Album
Appearance
Richard D. James Album is currently an Albums good article nominee. Nominated by lunaeclipse ⚧ (talk) at 00:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)
|
Richard D. James Album (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 22 August 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
B-class
[edit]How much work does this article need to reach B-class? I can't find any reliable sources about copies sold, background or release. – electricController 15:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- To get it to be B-class, I would suggest posting the album at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and note you are looking for a B-class review, someone will take a peak at it from there. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Andrzejbanas: Thank you. – electricController 18:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Great work on taking a step forward on this article. I think its looking fairly good but I'd suggest we combine the smaller sections unless you think they will be expanded further. Sections that are only one paragraph or less long usually look "unfinished" even if its all the information we can get. I often combine "release and reception" sections if the albums I review don't really chart or get re-released or whatever. Might be an idea here, but no real pressure. Great work! Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! Great suggestion. – electricController 18:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Great work on taking a step forward on this article. I think its looking fairly good but I'd suggest we combine the smaller sections unless you think they will be expanded further. Sections that are only one paragraph or less long usually look "unfinished" even if its all the information we can get. I often combine "release and reception" sections if the albums I review don't really chart or get re-released or whatever. Might be an idea here, but no real pressure. Great work! Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Andrzejbanas: Thank you. – electricController 18:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)