Jump to content

Talk:Jennifer Hawkins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Australian Heritage

[edit]

This article states she is of Australian heritage when Australian is not considered an ethnicity/ancestral background as all white Australians have some sort of European heritage. Her surname is of English (Anglo-Saxon) origin, however considering she hasn't stated her heritage we can't claim it to be English purely based on her surname as there could be other ethnicities in her, but I propose that the line "her parents are of Australian heritage" be changed to her parents are of Anglo and/or English Australian heritage, or just simply remove the line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.147.166 (talk) 03:13, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by Yukaxu

[edit]

These appear to be a copyvio from here:

http://www.askmen.com/women/models_250/251c_jennifer_hawkins.html (probably NWS unless you work for a men's magazine)

As such, I am going to revert them all.

Australian prom date?

[edit]

Just read on Yahoo! that she later accepted again, but wants to keep it low-key.

Semi-protected

[edit]

There has been a campaign by various anon editors over the last few weeks of including large un-encyclopaedic images in the article. Hence it is now semi-protected. Leave a message on my talk page if this causes undue problems. —Moondyne 09:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Un-encyclopaedic? Why don't we remove all the pictures of George W Bush off his article because they're 'un-encyclopaedic'? Atlantis Hawk 10:49, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Because the photos on the George W. Bush page ARE encyclopaedic. Don't be a smartarse. —Moondyne 00:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth

[edit]

Askmen states her date of birth as simply '1984'. IMDB and Celebopedia both say 22 December 1983. I think the latter refs are stronger given they have a full date. IMDB is often wrong admittedly, but it is widely read and reviewed and I'm sure that error would have been picked up if it was wrong. I've reverted the article accordingly. The anon editor needs to provide stronger sources before re-reverting the article to say 1984. —Moondyne 00:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, if you read the following Article Mr "Moondyne", the point of her contract to them was to celbrate her coming 23rd birthday...How can she therefore be born in 1983? I like math. Yes, IMDB is wrong, Celebopedia probably took their info from imdb...I would change it but i don't have such capable powers. This means a lot to Jenny if her date is correct on wikipedia.

I've changed the date back to 1984. You can now carry on playing world of warcraft—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.91.75.61 (talkcontribs)

I suggest you do your maths again, and at the same time drop your sarcasm and snide remarks. I'm changing it back to 1983 per the source you provided. —Moondyne 00:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Moondyne, I think the guy is correct. If you're born in 1983, and have your birthday on December then you would be celebrating your 24th Birthday and not your 23rd Birthday, as the article suggests. Therefore I've changed the date as per his remarks - David —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.154.68.174 (talk) 08:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
David, the article was written in January 2007 and says "The deal was signed on December 22, her 23rd birthday", so its safe to assume that its referring to her turning 23 on 22 December 2006. 2006-23=1983. Or to put it another way, if she was born in December 1984, she'd be having her 23rd birthday in December 2007 and that hasn't happened yet. What am I missing? —Moondyne 08:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


she has been offered $50,000 to pose nude in a mag shoot. Zoo

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resides ?

[edit]

Article says she resides in Newcastle. Article on Clovelly, New South Wales says she is a current resident. Is either of these comments true ? Citable ? -Sticks66 13:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Claire cover

[edit]

{{editsemiprotected}} On January 6 2010, Hawkins appeared naked and unretouched on the February cover of Marie Claire Australia magazine to support the Butterfly Foundation and encourage positive attitudes to body image. [1]

123.211.239.16 (talk) 03:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I templated the cite, anyone is free to change the location of it, as I currently placed in endorsements, but it might fit in other sections. -Optigan13 (talk) 04:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's where I tried to put it. Josh Parris 04:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ [1], marie claire, 3 Jan 2010

Nose job?

[edit]

Why isn't there any discussion of her plastic surgery? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.159.111.98 (talk) 10:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got a reliable source backing it up? If so please be bold and add it to the article. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jennifer Hawkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jennifer Hawkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jennifer Hawkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]